>>1362032>There are far more disproving itlol no, there isn't. you drug addict
>https://news.utdallas.edu/social-sciences/study-medical-marijuana-legalization-doesnt-lead-t/"social science"
kek
>This is how you know you've lost the argumentyou can at least try to fake that you use this site, drug addict
> There's no correlation between harsher penalties for marijuana and crime reduction.except there is because the harsher weed penalties caused crime to drop by half in the 90s and then crime went back up when weed became legal
>randlol, literally an israeli company that wants drug addicts hooked on their product
>some retards term paperhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6461328/"But Mr. Booker is wrong. The first four states to legalize marijuana for recreational use were Colorado and Washington in 2014 and Alaska and Oregon in 2015. Combined, those four states had about 450 murders and 30,300 aggravated assaults in 2013. In 2017, they had almost 620 murders and 38,000 aggravated assaults—an increase far greater than the national average."
>posts the same study twiceyou want me to post more, faggot? you had to cite some fag's term paper and the rand corp
>I've posted two studies that debunk this nonsense.you posted some fag's research paper and the rand corp, you are grasping at straws because you are drug addicted
>No it wont.yes it will, oregon already went back on their drug shit. drugs will be banned again
>How does it feel to know that I smoke weed every dayI know you are heavily drug addicted, poor and your dick don't work and that is why you are having such a me;lty because your hobby is going to get banned because it causes crime and also your dick don't work
