>>1372551>Are you the anal retentive anon that called me a shitposter?I've been described as 'anally retentive' on more than one occasion. I've previously called other contributions shitpost. As to if I'm responsible for the incident you're thinking of I'm entirely unsure - but I doubt it. It's not impossible, but I really don't think so. Do you regular post shit? if so that raises the odds somewhat.
>This is some really shit posted here, so you felt the anal need to reply?It is indeed. Thusly I felt curious as to what about this qualifies as 'news'. Maybe there's something subtle I've missed somewhere. Neither the article's headline, textual body, or supporting image provision any sense of anything other than: Operating as intended.
>Here is some resl (blog) Indian newsNo, it's a blog. Not news.
It also fails to add any information that would support the initial post that started the thread.
So, with this in mind, regardless of any previous occurances I'll now conclude you are indeed a shitposter. Now you can rightly accuse me of such.
