Elon Musk finds massive discrepancies in the social security administration.
Neonazi socialists are literally imploding as their fraud schemes are about to come crashing down on them
https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-raises-alarm-social-security-doge-2032052 Elon Musk Raises Alarm Over Social Security
Tech billionaire Elon Musk has taken issue with payments made by the Social Security Administration (SSA) as his spending task force investigates the government agency.
Why It Matters
Social Security benefits are paid to tens of millions of Americans every month, and help form the bedrock of income for many retirees, survivors of deceased claimants and disabled people.
Musk, who was selected by President Donald Trump to head the non-official Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has been tasked with streamlining government processes and cutting spending.
Posting on X, formerly Twitter, Musk presented a spreadsheet of data showing "the numbers of people in each age bucket with the death field set to FALSE!"
It includes 46 million between the ages of 60 and 69, the period during which a person becomes eligible to collect retirement benefits. It also includes more than ten million listed as being above the age of 100, including one who is recorded as being between the ages of 360 to 369 years of age.
"Maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security," Musk wrote.
Newsweek has been unable to verify the data Musk has presented. The total of the numbers included add up to considerably more than the number of beneficiaries that are paid by the Social Security Administration (SSA) every month, which was around 73 million as of January this year. It is also higher than the total U.S. population, which is around 341 million at the time of the last census in 2020.
Newsweek has contacted the SSA for comment via email outside of regular working hours.
Anonymous
>>1385027 Newsweek has been unable to verify the data Musk has presented. The total of the numbers included add up to considerably more than the number of beneficiaries that are paid by the Social Security Administration (SSA) every month, which was around 73 million as of January this year. It is also higher than the total U.S. population, which is around 341 million at the time of the last census in 2020.
Newsweek has contacted the SSA for comment via email outside of regular working hours.
This is not the first time Musk has taken issue with spending at the SSA, which has among the largest annual expenditures in the U.S. government budget.
"If money is spent badly, if your taxpayer dollars are not spent in a sensible and frugal manner, then that's not okay. Your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on the things that matter to the people," Musk said speaking from the White House last week alongside President Trump. "It's just common sense. It's not draconian or radical. I think it's really just saying let's look at each of the expenditures and say, is this actually in the best interest of the people, and if it is, it's approved, if it's not, we should think about it."
He added: "There's crazy things, like, just a cursory examination of Social Security and we've got people in there that are about 150 years old. Now, do you know anyone that's 150? I don't. OK. They should be on the Guinness Book of World Records, they're missing out.
Musk wrote on X on February 11: "At this point, I am 100% certain that the magnitude of the fraud in federal entitlements (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Disability, etc) exceeds the combined sum of every private scam you've ever heard by FAR. It's not even close."
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385027 wow maybe people should start experimenting on americans some of them are literally immortal.
Anonymous
This is because the agency's computers use an old programming language, and they don't have birthdates for every person in the system. When they leave the field blank, the system registers it as them being 150 years old.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/2/14/2303889/-Nope-There-are-no-150-year-olds-on-Social-Security-It-s-COBOL Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385028 >>1385027 >Newsweek Newsweek is not a credible news source.
Anonymous
>>1385034 >Dailykos Oh man, dailykos? Sweet, totally not biased!
What about the 16 million between the ages of 110 and 149?
What about the 250k between the ages of 160 and 350 fucking years old?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
And of course every single one of those fake accounts is going to be a registered Democrat and all the money is being funnelled back to the DNC
Anonymous
>>1385027 And here it is, Elon's excuse to cut social security entirely and for the Republicans to tell you that it's good, actually
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385034 According to the numbers, Daily Retard, according to what is posted in that image about 5% of Americans are between the ages of 110 and 149. How do the experts at Daily Kos explain that?
(It shows about 15 Million in that age range and the population of the US is 370 million)
Anonymous
>>1385034 Also, it turns out the daily Kos is lying
>COBOL does not default to May 20, 1875, for corrupt or missing dates. COBOL, a programming language used extensively in government and financial systems, does not have a built-in date type. Dates are typically represented as numeric values, and handling of missing or corrupt dates is left to the programmer. >The confusion around May 20, 1875, stems from the ISO 8601 standard, which uses this date as a reference point for the Gregorian calendar. However, this does not imply that COBOL or any of its implementations use this date as a default for missing or corrupt data entries.
https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/31288/did-missing-corrupt-dates-in-cobol-default-to-1875-05-20 https://iter.ca/post/1875-epoch/ Anonymous
Quoted By:
/g/ is laughing that the latest demtard cope that 1875 is somehow a default date in cobol
>>>/g/104382190 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385040 You mean cutting funding to Democrats
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385040 Sounds to me like he's going to be cutting funding to people defrauding social security.
I don't know why you people would be against this, only fraudsters would not want this to happen... Oh wait.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If they find out who is defrauding SSA, then direct that money to go to Israel, then we're all for it here.
Anonymous
>>1385038 Ok here's the second explanation, straight from the SSA audit.
https://oig.ssa.gov/assets/uploads/a-06-21-51022.pdf Maybe that's good enough for you jackass Elon
Anonymous
>>1385043 Oh boy, some guy on Stack Exchange said so. I guess that's supposed to be credible, it was peer reviewed by anonymous after all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385052 >>1385034 Hey sisters, I just got sent here by everyone else in the discord.
What's our excuse for this one? Is it that cobol has a secret default date of 1875 or is it that the social security system office forgot to market millions of people as being dead?
What about the 250k people shown as born before 1875?
What about the 2 people being shown as born in the 1600s?
Let's get out stories straight and punch these Nazis!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385053 Honestly a stack exchange answer with nearly 100 up votes in 48 hours is worth 1000x a political article written by the fucking Daily Kos on a technical topic
Anonymous
>>1385052 >>1385034 Hey sisters, I just got sent here by everyone else in the discord.
What's our excuse for this one? Is it that cobol has a secret default date of 1875 or is it that the social security system office forgot to market millions of people as being dead?
What about the 250k people shown as born before 1875?
What about the 2 people being shown as born in the 1600s?
Let's get our stories straight and punch these Nazis!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385057 No you're right, go ahead and cut off grandma's social security because they had weird bookkeeping, I'm sure this won't end poorly for you.
Anonymous
>>1385040 Social security was always a shitty program. It was never the government's job to provide retirement aid, and 401Ks have made it completely irrelevant. Basically, get a job, buy a retirement plan, save up, be a man and stop relying on any handouts.
Hitler approved this post
>>1385061 This anon is in touch with reality, and the dog eat dog nature of humans.Any homeless 70 yr old too stupid to have saved should die like a dog in the snow. Or eat dog food if they have a home.
Anonymous
>>1385071 >Any homeless 70 yr old too stupid to have saved should die like a dog in the snow. Or eat dog food if they have a home. They are a drain on society. You work, you contribute to the economy, you get paid, you live. You don't work hard enough, you don't contribute enough, you don't get paid, you die. That is the simple law of the land. If old people can't work, then maybe they shouldn't exist. The body politic has no need for cogs that do not turn properly. The body politic cares not if the cog is happy, merely that it turns. If the body politic does not turn efficiently, if there are saboteurs (leftists), then the body politic weakens and is slain by its rivals. That is nature's law. What matters is not happiness or feeling good, it is survival. Happiness is for those who rise above the menials through their singular grit and brilliance.
Anonymous
>>1385073 I am no longer able to tell if this is satire or an actual retard.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385075 I'd love to see a 70 y/o version of that anon above, in the street, complaining they can't get anything to eat because Social Sec doesnt' exist anymore.
Anonymous
>>1385027 correction: Elon *says* he found discrepancies in the social security system. If you don't know the difference, you are in the cult.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385073 Translation: "MOM! Bring me some more tendies! I'm STARVING down here!"
Anonymous
>>1385077 Do you think it's all fake?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>1385083 >https://polymarket.com/doge This website just makes false clai.s and links to musk tweets as its evidence. Musk gas not released evidence of this waste fraud or abuse. Just misinformation tweets and conservatives like you repeat them without fact checking. Musk tests are not facts or evidence.
Anonymous
>>1385084 The daily cloud screaming from you people never gets old
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385085 The daily cumguzzling by you people already got old last year.
Anonymous
>>1385082 >Do you think it's all fake? I think it's not what he thinks it is because he doesn't know what he's looking at. Dipshit found a list of SS numbers and decided they must all be considered alive and getting checks.
>>1385083 >$50 billion saved You save money by making systems more efficient. If you just cut systems entirely, that doesn't save you money because then you have to deal with the cost of not having those systems.
To use an example, if you stopped buying groceries to "save money" you won't cause you'll either die or need to eat out at an even greater cost later.
Hitler approved this post
Quoted By:
>>1385073 Ok jr miss Ayn Rand
musk stands on Tesla's shoulders & falls off
musk stands on Tesla's shoulders & falls off Tue 18 Feb 2025 15:44:42 No. 1385092 Report >>1385089 >Dipshit found a list of SS numbers and decided they must all be considered alive and getting checks. Attention whore PR international banker genius man.(Musk gave some workers plans for Tesla's and rocket ships and a blue print to the human brane (where to install genius chips) and said "go to work, workers, I've done my part
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385089 >and decided they must all be considered alive and getting checks Well, he decided they must be alive because they have the "death field" set to false, which is probably the only way to interpret that field.
He did not say they are all getting checks, you made that last part up, but gaslighting and lying is pretty standard for you people
Anonymous
>>1385089 >If you just cut systems entirely, that doesn't save you money because then you have to deal with the cost of not having those systems. >In other words, every federal program costs less federal dollars to run than not to run it! Lol. So your solution is to make more federal programs and spend more money because that somehow saves money. Retarded take.
What your describing is named an "opportunity cost", or I guess in this case it's an opportunity savings. And there literally is no reason to believe that for every organization the opportunity cost of removing it is less than the money saved upon removing it
Yes, you can cherry pick examples like the the IRS or other primary sources of federal income, if you remove the source of income, the opportunity cost of keeping it is less than removing it because removal translates to less income.
I would wager most federal programs have a net negative opportunity cost; it costs more to run than than it does not to run them
Anonymous
>leftoid libshit squealing over Elon emptying out their piggy bank continues Lmao. More.
Anonymous
>>1385097 Anon is right though. It's only saving money if you accomplish the same thing for lesser cost. Cutting programs entirely just gets rid of the benefits
Anonymous
>>1385099 >you can't put out the house fire until you have an appropriate plan for rebuilding the house Anonymous
>>1385098 It's going to be a long four years for these faggots. Imagine if this actually works and we don't have another Democrat in office for decades. Jews might actually allow it as long as Israel gets funded and is allowed to bomb every other country
Anonymous
>>1385089 > Data gets messy Exactly. Anyone who’s worked on any data system with more than a few million records knows how many errors creep in. Or how the definition of fields/properties change over time.
Or how easy it is to not know you have to join to some dataset over here where the fields are interpreted in one specific way.
That’s not to say there isn’t fraud, but there’s a much much simpler explanation.
t. Data engineer at several few tech companies
Anonymous
>>1385107 Thinking about it more this is definitely cherry picked for the reaction. Elon has enough experience to know how unreliable data is over time. His doge employees probably don’t (you have to spend a few months to a year saying “wtf” at data before you realize it’s pervasive).
socialist Phoenix rises from ashes
Quoted By:
>>1385102 >Imagine if this actually works N'YUCK N'YUCK, What's that smell? Attention ho Musk's tux coattails on fire.
Anonymous
>>1385100 >People getting benefits inefficiently is a house fire A more appropriate comparison would be you don't tear down your house until you've got a new place to stay, a thing that is obviously true.
>Lol. So your solution is to make more federal programs and spend more money because that somehow saves money. Retarded take. More federal programs spending more money can save money if taxpayers have to pay private companies more for an alternative service. That's literally why we have a postal service and why we should have universal healthcare and paperless direct tax filing, but my solution to government waste specifically is to find the fucking waste and fix it. As an example, we spend a metric fuckton keeping gun sale records collected by the federal government in what amounts to a giant rat-eaten unsorted pile of physical records that people have to search by hand instead of just having a digital database.
You fix shit by replacing it with something cheaper and more efficient.
>And there literally is no reason to believe that for every organization the opportunity cost of removing it is less than the money saved upon removing it And there is literally no reason to believe they've taken the time to even look at opportunity cost before cutting jack shit. There is a reason to believe that for your average program, it was created for a reason and will come with a greater opportunity cost to remove it. So how the fuck do you justify taking shit whole cloth to the shredder without even fucking checking?
And don't lie to my face and tell me they are checking. They fucking fired the people in charge of tracking our nuclear weapons without even asking them what their fucking job was.
>I would wager most federal programs have a net negative opportunity cost And I would wager you're a jackass. God, your argument really does come down to "We would be better off without our government." Fuck off and die.
Anonymous
>>1385099 The benefits shouldn't even exist.
>>1385089 More like paying for an expensive brand new toy, then complaining when you can't pay for the groceries.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385102 We won't because all of them and their voters will be in camps. We are a one party state now, the based party.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385053 more credible then your retarded TDS ass maybe you should just go ahead and off yourself since ur so anti-truth
Anonymous
>>1385099 >It's only saving money if you accomplish the same thing for lesser cost. This is absolutely a retarded take.
It's saving money when you don't spend the money.
Sure, one can accomplish that by performing the same task at a lower expense, one can also accomplish saving money by not spending the money at all
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385073 Who actually wants to live past 60 nowadays anyways? Maybe if you got the money, but for me, I'm going out in the woods to die when I start feeling my body fail. The American retirement plan is death. You work until you can, then you willingly go off to die on your own terms so that you won't have to suffer the decline and be a drain on anyone/society.
Anonymous
>>1385117 Then starve yourself then. You'll save so much.
We're going to find out first hand just how much of these things were nessasary, and I guarantee you with how indiscriminate these cuts are the answer is going to be "quite a few of them".
Anonymous
>>1385108 >Elon has enough experience to know how unreliable data is over time. Elon has no experience with actual data. I'm willing to bet the guy has never personally programmed or internally designed something in his life. Just paying other people to do it and profiting off of them.
Anonymous
>>1385120 If you starved because Elon cut benefits, then you deserved to starve. Starvation is just the method nature uses to remove the useless.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385121 Elon is one of the greatest geniuses to exist right now. He could learn how to data in a few days better than some 30 yrs government bum.
Anonymous
>>1385121 Didn't he make Paypal?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385128 Hunt your own food then bitch.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385132 Nope. He made a financial services company that merged with PayPal. He had no hand in any kind of programming the actual systems at play there, in in-fact got kicked off due to mismanagement like a year later.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385113 >The benefits shouldn't even exist. He posts on the internet, a thing literally created in part by fucking DARPA.
I wish dipshits like you RPing as anarchists would act like a real anarchist and fuck off into the woods to die.
Anonymous
>>1385082 Elon has been caught posting lies on X many times. He has a direct financial interest in everything DOGE is doing. He is eliminating competition and forcing work into the private sector to gain more contracts. He admits this.
Anonymous
>>1385092 The only thing Elon ever "designed" was the Cybertruck. Everything else has been on the books when he bought the companies. The Cybertruck is a disaster. That is his only legacy.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385027 I can't wait to see absolutely no one getting prosecuted for this because Elon is a fucking moron who can't interpret data
When someone gets charged and there's an article about it maybe it'll be real
Anonymous
>>1385141 >The Cybertruck is a disaster. Is that why the military has placed a bid on 400 mil worth of cybertrucks? You libs just need to stop. Stop lying, stop, before Trump makes you stop.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385144 >then why did the guy who was put in charge of government finances order 400 million of his own useless trucks if they're so useless? Shills aren't even trying anymore.
If you had any pride you'd kill yourself, troon
Anonymous
>>1385144 The military placed that order under Biden last fall, and Trump cancelled it. The order no longer exists.
Just Stop Lying For Once.
Just Stop.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385149 stop repeating easily debunked lies
Trumps government literally released a press statement saying they were going to purchase 400 million dollars of Teslas, then edited it later to read as more generic electronic cars after they got called out
Anonymous
>>1385149 They will never stop lying, EDS and TDS are both crippling diseases on their own, and these people often suffer from both.
60% of them have been diagnosed with a mental illness by their doctor at some point in time.
These aren't reasonable people who will just stop lying
Anonymous
>>1385157 I don't think the Republican party will recover from EDS or TDS, we may just need to cull conservatives altogether.
They'll keep lying and shilling regardless
Anonymous
>>1385144 It was the state department and that shit got canceled.
Anonymous
>>1385167 >shit got canceled. except it didn't
try again, shill
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385165 Wow, you really have lost all motivation, haven't you, shill?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385175 >but trump said they won't now! >he never ever ever ever lies! here i'll just pretend i'm a republican shill
Anonymous
>>1385140 prove it or kill yourself, and itd better not be that stupid oh he cheated on poe2 shit.
Anonymous
>>1385197 thanks for proving it dumbass
Anonymous
>>1385197 >sure musk lies compulsively about little things all the time >he wouldn't lie about a big thing though! do zoomers really?
Anonymous
>>1385197 Well there's also:
>The multiple crypto rugpulls >claiming twitter has to remain politically neutral >so many fucking instances of falling for fake shit >saying "next year we'll have a fleet of automated taxis" five years in a row >the hyperloop >claiming to be head of DOGE when he's not even an employee (we don't know who the real administrator is) Anonymous
>>1385198 >>1385200 >>1385201 so, you retards have 0 proof and your only evidence is he lied about playing on an account for gamercred. wow that sure is on the same level as possible usurpation and tyranny right amirite.
what a waste of my time go ahead and kill yourself.
>>1385201 If twitter wasn't politically neutral you'd be banned right now and a hitsquad would be sent to execute you.
Anonymous
>>1385205 you're a faggot and you're wrong 100% of the time
Anonymous
>>1385205 Where's my fleet of automated taxis fuckwit? Where's the hyperloop? Where's all the crypto currencies he inflated then rugpulled on?
Anonymous
>>1385208 None of that is true and secondly none of it is relevant to DOGE
Anonymous
>>1385209 you should be induced into the faggot hall of fame, lying faggot
Anonymous
>>1385197 Did you miss the meltdown a month back?
tl;dr
>Musk and Vivek openly call Americans too stupid, lazy and entitled to train, that's why they need H1B visas to import engineers from India (read: a nation where the IQ of the average Indian is 74) >MAGA voters call both them retarded, say they voted for Trump because they didn't want migrants taking their jobs >Musk spergs out, says that he is a H1B immigrant and will fight anybody who disagrees >MAGA realizes that H1B visas are public, so are the companies which use them >some digging later, MAGA finds out that Tesla is using Pajeets for janitors, cooks and software enginers >some companies are using visas for exotic dancers and message therapists >Musk starts banning and removing checkmarks from everybody who disagrees All of this shit happened after he spent mountains of cash turning Twitter into a free speech platform.
He's vindicating groypers on their "great replacement" theory shit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385209 you should be inducted into the faggot hall of fame, lying faggot
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385210 no, you just don't understand
all his other lies about everything don't count
he may not be lying THIS time, so libs lose forever
This makes sense to me because I'm a retarded MAGA faggot
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385209 >Sure he lied about all these other things, but he's telling the truth now! Hell, we have him lying on DOGE topics too. Remember when he said New York secretly spent 59 million in FEMA disaster relief on migrants? Whoops, turns out that not only was those funds always meant for that cause and not part of the same funds FEMA draws from for disaster relief, but it was approved by congress as part of a program Trump himself put into place.
Or hell, barring that, how about claiming money laundering involving USAID but not actually providing a single piece of proof the money was actually being laundered? Because in case you don't know, donating to a cause you think is stupid is wasteful, but not an active crime.
Anonymous
>>1385206 you lied on here so you lied in real life, you're probably a narcassistic loser whose mad Elon has money. After all you're here saying he lied about playing a video game he must've lied about not stealing our social security numbas
>>1385211 I mean is he wrong americans are too stupid to train. I don't really see how that's a lie. Oh wow I'm sure dead people and people with brain damage because of lack of nutrients were born that way.
Its obviously a diversion you're bring up.
we're good with like an 80% population control on americans.
Anonymous
Elon dicksuckers are simply born to be slaves.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385209 >Sure he lied about all these other things, but he's telling the truth now! Hell, we have him lying on DOGE topics too. Remember when he said New York secretly spent 59 million in FEMA disaster relief on migrants? Whoops, turns out that not only was those funds always meant for that cause and not part of the same funds FEMA draws from for disaster relief, but it was approved by congress for that exact purpose.
Or hell, barring that, how about claiming money laundering involving USAID but not actually providing a single piece of proof the money was actually being laundered? Because in case you don't know, donating to a cause you think is stupid is wasteful, but not an active crime.
Anonymous
>>1385216 I support elon in making you slaves muahahhaha. You're going to lose your possessions your home everything short of your life. you won't even be able to afford a big mac once he's done with you.
Anonymous
>>1385215 >I mean is he wrong americans are too stupid to train. I don't really see how that's a lie. He doesn't want to train them because they are too expensive hire, not because they're stupid.
One of the things we found during this entire shitstorm was that Pajeet outsourcing companies, and the companies which hire them, take a cut of their paycheck in exchange for cronyism. Elon doesn't want 74 IQ jeets because they are smarter, it's because they are slave labor. He has their balls in a vice and can send them back home if they complain.
Anonymous
>>1385218 you won't do shit nerd
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385220 they're too fat from too many big macs.
You wish you could afford enough to be as corpulent and retarded as they are
don't be jelly
Anonymous
>>1385219 have you seen the average american? they aren't smart at all especially middle-class losers.
desperation breeds competence.
>>1385220 I've had 2 eggs today for breakfast soon you won't even be able to afford that with your month's pay.
Anonymous
>>1385225 thanks for finally admitting you're not american, shill faggot. we knew the whole time btw
Anonymous
>>1385226 but they didn't admit they aren't american
are you really that retarded?
Anonymous
>>1385227 yeah, they can't spell for shit. it's pretty obvious even when they pretend not to be foreign shills
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385229 >they can't spell for shit I knew all the magafags on this board were foreign shills
Anonymous
>>1385229 sure thing retard, americans are dogshit at the only language they use lmao.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385233 >Sure thing, retard, Americans are dog-shit at the only language that they use, lmao. fixed that for you
Anonymous
>>1385233 you're such a useless inconsistent faggot that i'm sure you'll be laid off from your shitposting job soon
Anonymous
>>1385235 you'll be livestock soon enough, why does anyone care about your opinion kekeke
Anonymous
>>1385236 you're a foreign shill, i don't think it's possible for an american to have a more miserable life than you, undignified faggot
Anonymous
>>1385238 I hope you get raped by a tranny because that's what you deserve. You'll be anal raped in prison until your anus has a gapping giant hole then used as the prison bitch to be anal fisted by the gangs.
worst part is you'll be enjoying it subhuman
Anonymous
>>1385239 so do they rape you if you don't post enough or is that just your fetish
Anonymous
>>1385240 oh you poor sob you don't know what papa elon has in store for you. All of this thread will be taken as evidence against YOU as a traitor of the state. with your plans for domestic treason.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385241 no answer? well i'll just assume you get punitively raped on the regular then. coincidentally you're also a faggot
Anonymous
>>1385241 so in your fantasies, you hunt down the libs and make sure they get thoroughly anally raped?
how close do you monitor the raping?
do you do it yourself?
do you ever look in the mirror and wonder why you're such a fucked up tranny fetishist?
Ooooh, you're praying for Elon to set up the tranny rape camps so you can finally fuck a man while pretending that you're 'resisting'
Anonymous
>>1385243 nah the trannies would enjoy it so they go to the soylent greens processing plant.
Anonymous
>>1385245 you already told us you enjoy it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1385246 they literally said they wanted to enjoy trannies orally in the post you replied to
Anonymous
Quoted By:
damn musk fans are the worst
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If that chart was real. Wouldn't it of made more sense to find those abusing the system? I don't believe the chart.
Anonymous
>>1385112 1. Government spending needs to be curtailed and Social Security is our second largest federal expenditure. The voting public won't stomach cuts to it, but strictly auditing it is the next most effective thing.
2. Even cheaper than a digital database would be just not keeping records, and a searchable database is currently illegal. The cheapest relevant and viable option at this time is getting rid of the records altogether.
3. Current levels of government spending cannot be offset under any taxation regime, and long term deficit spending is eventually harmful to any economy. Those are both facts. Therefore, we cannot assume that your average program is saving us more money than we're spending on it. So we have to check. The admin is choosing to risk cutting too much than not enough. I don't agree with that, but the logic itself is there. My guess is nobody walks away from this happy, but the fix down the line is a step in the right direction.
4. Government is explicitly a necessary evil that must be kept in check. Have a good one.
Anonymous
This shit is how we got $36 trillion debt.
Anonymous