SSA whistleblower lodges complaint against DOGE
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/26/us/politics/doge-social-security-data.html https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/a9f2afd18a79e330/b181d62a-full.pdf Dear All:
The Government Accountability Project represents Mr. Chuck Borges, the Chief Data
Officer (CDO) at the Social Security Administration (SSA), and a whistleblower. Mr. Borges
presents the following disclosures to your attention pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 2302 , 5 U.S.C. § 1213
and 5 U.S.C § 7211 for your respective offices to take appropriate oversight action.
In recent weeks Mr. Borges has become aware through reports to him of serious data
security lapses, evidently orchestrated by DOGE officials, currently employed as SSA employees,
that risk the security ofover 300 millionAmericans' Social Security data.1 Mr. Borges' disclosures
involve wrongdoing including apparent systemic data security violations, uninhibited
administrative access to highly sensitive production environments,2 and potential violations of internal SSA security protocols and federal privacy laws by DOGE personnel Edward Coristine
Aram Moghaddassi John Solly and Michael Russo.3 These actions constitute violations of laws, rules and regulations abuse of authority mismanagement and creation of threat to public health and safety. Since February 2025 it has been widely reported that DOGE officials have sought to access
the American public's Social Security data purportedly to address claims of fraud. A lawsuit has
been filed resulting in temporary restraining order to limit DOGE's access to this sensitive
data What has not been reported are DOGE's actions in violation of SSA protocols and policies
under the authority of SSA Chief Information Officer (CIO Aram Mogaddassi to create live copy of the country's Social Security information in cloud environment that circumvents oversight.
Anonymous
cloud environment is effectively live copy of the entire country's Social Security information from the Numerical Identification System (NUMIDENT database that apparently lacks any security oversight from SSA or tracking to determine who is accessing or has accessed the copy of this data NUMIDENT contains all data submitted in an application for United States Social Security card including the name ofthe applicant place and date ofbirth citizenship race and ethnicity parents names and social security numbers phone number address and other personal information Should bad actors gain access to this cloud environment Americans may be susceptible to widespread identity theft may lose vital healthcare and food benefits and the government may be responsible for re issuing every American new Social Security Number at great cost Mr. Borges reports supported by documentary evidence reveal disturbing pattern of questionable and risky security access and administrative misconduct that implicates some ofthe public's most sensitive data Mr. Borges has raised concerns internally with various authorities in the Chief Information Officer's (CIO office and to date has not been made aware of any remedial action He therefore elevates his concerns out of sense of urgency and duty to the American public Since February several members of Congress have written letters and investigations to demand greater oversight over DOGE's access to SSA data. We urge all members ofCongress committed to the safety oftheir constituents' data along with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel to investigate the disclosures presented in this letter.
Anonymous
>>1429918 Already a thread on this
>>1429886 Anonymous
>>1429925 Yeah we all are well aware someone posted Rachel Maddow blogshit.
Personally, I'd like to keep the quality of threads on this board high.
Historically Rachel Maddow threads have been deleted.
For fucks sake, "maddowblog" is literally in the url of that thread
Anonymous
>>1429931 do you think anyone is moderating this glorified shitslinging board right now? there's a thread up right now where the only link is "
cia.gov "
Anonymous
>>1429931 Rachel Maddow isn't wrong though
Anonymous
>>1429933 >>1429932 Don't care.
I'm posting the original source because I care about the quality of the threads on this board, and posting threads citing "maddowblog" is clearly against rule 1: Blog and editorial articles are not acceptable.
Anonymous
>>1429936 Where did Rachel Maddow hurt you?
Anonymous
>>1429936 >I care about the quality of the threads on this board then why did you post this admittedly hilarious shitpost
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1429931 >Personally, I'd like to keep the quality of threads on this board high. >>1429936 >I care about the quality of the threads on this board hilarious
Anonymous
>>1429938 They pretend to care about quality, then deliberately refused to post the article text.
They're just raging and shilling per usual
Anonymous
>>1429940 >deliberately refused to post the article text. I posted both of the original sources, and my text is the text of the whistleblower complaint.
It doesn't get any more high quality than that, maddowblog-poster
Don't get salty that you post blogs. Instead, try not posting blogs.
Anonymous
>>1429944 I like how you bitch and moan about blogs when there's not a single personal opinion part of that article. You're literally seeing red over a part of the URL.
Anonymous
>>1429945 Just ignore him, he's trying to deflect from the content of the article.
Anonymous
>>1429944 >It doesn't get any more high quality than that Posting the original text of the news article you're posting is the highest quality
The board isn't called /sources/, shill
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1429918 No one cares, chud.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1429946 Yeah why would anyone want to read the whistleblower complaint, that's for Chuds. I read maddows blogs all day every day, that's where us educated folk learn the news at.
Anonymous
>>1429918 Post article in OP, faggot
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1429951 Read the whistleblower complaint, butthurt blogfag
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Ah, so we're in a shitty shill thread You can tell by OP being a faggot, not posting the article, and OP hanging around to make fun of people pointing out they didn't post the article.
Anonymous
>>1429920 >Since February several members of Congress have written letters and investigations to demand greater oversight over DOGE's access to SSA data. We urge all members ofCongress committed to the safety oftheir constituents' data along with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel to investigate the disclosures presented in this letter. So nothing's going to happen except "strong urging".
Anonymous
>>1429954 Dunno.
Maybe they should implement the proper auditing procedures on it though. Pretty sure the judicial orders said they could access the data and work with it, but I would presume standard access and data protection guidelines still apply
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1429947 > Why in the world would anyone want to understand the cause of a controversy? I don't have time for that, I want people I've never met before to tell me how I should feel about recent events Anonymous
>this link is absolutely board relevant, even though it would be deleted if I posted it by itself Post the article, faggot
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1429970 What's your problem
my ass & I had a good talk & decided
>>1429937 >Where did Rachel Maddow hurt you? He felt a same sex attraction toward Rachel maddow. The Anon is very confused
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1430016 This post makes no sense
Anonymous
Any crying over DOGE is just white noise at this point. Democrats just want their unlimited gibs and corruption
Anonymous
>>1430101 if you keep fellating billionaires like this you're going to choke to death
Anonymous
>>1430102 >Those damn billionaires spending millions of dollars on gay muppets in the middle east Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1430105 Yeah, we gotta get that money out of there. How else are we going to give it all to billionaires?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1429955 If it isn't explicitly stated then it didn't happen. Power hungry autists auditing for "their" country...
Nice DD's
Anonymous
>>1430102 Do you think the billionaires with infinitely better credit than yours are trying to steal your identity?
Anonymous
>>1430189 i can't understand you. what does gawk gawk gawk mean
Anonymous
>>1430191 It means you think about dicks too much.
You know what you are suggesting is retarded.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1430192 i can barely hear you, but from what i can tell it sounds like a strawman. wipe that drool off your face, you're shameless
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1430189 Rich people are well-known for not wanting more money or power.