[13 / 1 / ?]
Quoted By: >>1430236
> Thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=844plbHuW84
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyjq40vjl7o
> 4chan launches legal action against Ofcom in US
> Lawyers representing controversial online forums 4chan and Kiwi Farms have filed a legal case against the UK Online Safety Act enforcer, Ofcom.
> Their legal complaint filed in a Washington DC Federal Court seeks a legal ban on the UK communications regulator enforcing or attempting to enforce the Online Safety Act against them in the US.
> "American citizens do not surrender our constitutional rights just because Ofcom sends us an e-mail," Preston Byrne of law firm Byrne & Storm said.
> Ofcom told the BBC: "We are aware of this lawsuit. Under the Online Safety Act, any service that has links with the UK now has duties to protect UK users, no matter where in the world it is based."
> A service doesn't have to be based in the UK to be subject to the act, and therefore face action from Ofcom.
> It could be enough for it to have a significant number of UK users, or to have the UK as a target market.
> But 4chan's lawyers want the US court to rule that US business with no presence in the UK are not subject to British legislation.
> The also want it to declare that the Online Safety Act is at odds with the US constitution's free speech protections.
> Lawyers for online message board 4chan recently told the BBC that Ofcom had provisionally decided to impose a £20,000 fine "with daily penalties thereafter" for failing to comply with two requests for information.
> Ofcom alleges 4chan has not complied with the act with respect to the requests for information, but has not confirmed the provisional fine.
> It has also stated that it continues to investigate 4chan over whether it is complying with Online Safety Act duties to protect its users from illegal content.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyjq40vjl7o
> 4chan launches legal action against Ofcom in US
> Lawyers representing controversial online forums 4chan and Kiwi Farms have filed a legal case against the UK Online Safety Act enforcer, Ofcom.
> Their legal complaint filed in a Washington DC Federal Court seeks a legal ban on the UK communications regulator enforcing or attempting to enforce the Online Safety Act against them in the US.
> "American citizens do not surrender our constitutional rights just because Ofcom sends us an e-mail," Preston Byrne of law firm Byrne & Storm said.
> Ofcom told the BBC: "We are aware of this lawsuit. Under the Online Safety Act, any service that has links with the UK now has duties to protect UK users, no matter where in the world it is based."
> A service doesn't have to be based in the UK to be subject to the act, and therefore face action from Ofcom.
> It could be enough for it to have a significant number of UK users, or to have the UK as a target market.
> But 4chan's lawyers want the US court to rule that US business with no presence in the UK are not subject to British legislation.
> The also want it to declare that the Online Safety Act is at odds with the US constitution's free speech protections.
> Lawyers for online message board 4chan recently told the BBC that Ofcom had provisionally decided to impose a £20,000 fine "with daily penalties thereafter" for failing to comply with two requests for information.
> Ofcom alleges 4chan has not complied with the act with respect to the requests for information, but has not confirmed the provisional fine.
> It has also stated that it continues to investigate 4chan over whether it is complying with Online Safety Act duties to protect its users from illegal content.
