California passes a bill which will require developers of any operating system to implement a kernel API which will require that users of the operating system verify their identity when using the system.
This is supposedly to protect children from the dangers of downloading apps from the app store provided by their computer or mobile device.
https://news.bgov.com/bloomberg-government-news/app-stores-face-age-verification-task-in-cleared-california-bill https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1043/id/3268012 The state Assembly approved revisions to the measure (AB 1043) by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks (D) that would require app stores to check user ages to download apps and make purchases. The Senate earlier passed the measure 38-0 on Friday
This bill bill, beginning January 1, 2027, would require, among other things related to age verification on the internet, a covered manufacturer with respect to software applications, an operating system provider, as defined, to provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder, as defined, to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the sole purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store and to provide a developer, as defined, who has requested a signal with respect to a particular user with a digital signal via a reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface regarding whether a user is in any of several age brackets, as prescribed. The bill would define “covered manufacturer” to mean a person who is a manufacturer of a device, an operating system for a device, or a covered application store. The bill would require a developer to request a signal with respect to a particular user from a covered manufacturer an operating system provider or a covered application store when that user requests to download an application. the application is downloaded and launched.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
TS PMO. not only is this a huge security risk in many many devices. but just with one line "think about the kids" say that to the court and fucking win every right to a company. if this doesnt stop soon. the digital world COULD. crash sooner or later. "protecting kids" to hell with that. why aint no one talking abt kids in palestine. are they not human. i just feel theres something much deeper than concern for kids in this case..
Anonymous
>>1436085 Why are all these tech-illiterate fuckwits getting all these half-baked measures through all over the world at the same time? Anything but forcing parents to take some fucking responsibility...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
EXACTLY ISW. i doubt this is anything with online safety. maybe something to do with the government collecting info on everyone out there. could be something worse. (im onto something or nothing) think about it. instagram. facebook. twitter. all lack anons. and u give ur entire info to the platforms. who knows where your data goes. heard the rule about once somethings on the internet, it never gets deleted? . this might be the beginning of cyberpunk-(picture this in 10 years. huge corps with info on people. infact. info is all in the world that matters. smallest of it is costly.) i dont like how things are going but we got no proof or whatsoever anyways(welp. at least we got 4chan)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436097 Why was there a Cambrian Explosion 4 Billion years ago? It’s all on purpose, everybody!
Anonymous
>>1436085 don't worry the supreme court will demolish ts
Anonymous
>>1436111 ffs I hope so.
Idk why the fuck Democrats think they can legally require an operating system to spy on you.
What about shit like Linux that's literally developed all over the world by developers where 95% of them are not within Californias jurisdiction?
Anonymous
>>1436085 Nigel Farage opposes online safety legislation
Thanks for admitting you support Gary Glitter, Nige
Remember what happened decades ago after Glitter took his laptop to be repaired at a branch of PC World and a computer engineer there took a look at what was on his hard drive...!
Anonymous
>>1436118 >Linux Despite Covenant Eyes being installed on his Windows computer, rabidly judge-mental funda-mental-ist Christain rightard Josh Duggar installed Linux on another partition to get around that Windows app. As a result of what he'd downloaded: including some of the worst material in existence found to be on his HD after investigations, he's doing 12 years in Federal 'Pound Me In The Ass' prison, and after that, put on the sex offenders registry in perpetuity.
The FBI given relevant data by Scotland Yard, in turn helped by GCHQ which scans, monitors & intercepts the entire telecommunications network, including the Dark Web.
'Requiring an operating system to spy on you' is the least of anyone's problems. That info via Scotland Yard gathered by GCHQ & shared with the FBI. The latter work with Democrat administrations too.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436111 supreme court is a bunch of old boomer fucks that will support anything if it's "for the children"
Anonymous
>>1436165 Umm ok..?
Pretty unhinged rant
Anonymous
>>1436085 This on it's own doesn't sound THAT bad, but with everything else that's going on? Fucking hell, man.
Anonymous
>>1436209 I think the schizo's trying to say they can already spy on everything you do and that OS level monitoring isn't necessary at all if they want to get you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436219 >This on it's own doesn't sound THAT bad, nigga have you lost your mind
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436333 >They already have lots of surveillance and control, so who cares if they get even more surveillance and control? What a load of shit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436097 Big Cyberwar coming up. Everyone is drawing lines in the cybersand.
Anonymous
>>1436085 Oh, its just requiring an age section for the user account that gets shared to websites, and semi-privatizes it as age brackets.
Its not kernel level control or anything retarded like the schizos are crying about, they're just mindbroken by California after they removed DEI policies keeping Republicans in office.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436342 Not explicitly the kernel, but the legal document does mention that the operating system itself is required to have a user's birthdate/age for their account.
That being said, it makes no sense how this is supposed to verifiable or how it can possible be enforceable considering California isn't in charge of the world.
This bill can go one of two ways: 1) It gets laughed at by the rest of the world and any operating system development team, or 2) one or more country level governments decide this is a brilliant idea and start making operating systems that don't have mandatory age PII illegal to use.
Anonymous
>>1436085 >Children can no longer access porn >Democrats: How else are they going to find tranny and cuck porn. Think of the children's rights Anonymous
>>1436379 >Adults now cannot access porn unless they hand over their personal info >Surely this will never be used for any malicious things ever Next up we're banning bars because they might serve someone underage.
Anonymous
>>1436405 >Next up we're banning bars because they might serve someone underage. You have to show ID to get into a bar LMAO. Own goal of the century.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436209 >>1436333 libertarians scared that pedos won't have the right to be pedos any more
because so many of their ilk are pedos, or would be all for what happened to Josh Duggar and all of his ilk, and support any & all measures to make their vile perversion thoughtcrime Not beating the pedo supporter allegations via your unhginged posts, schizos that are >>1436209 & >>1436333 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436445 A child cannot access the internet without an adult buying it for them. This is like banning bars and declaring to get alcohol you need to check it out from the government directly, giving them your personal info each time. Oh, except it's handed to the government by either the shadiest guy you've ever met, or the most muggable looking guy you've ever seen.
Stop invading my privacy because you can't parent your kids.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436379 A retarded and disingenuous statement on 4chan, never thought i'd see that.
socialist Phoenix rises from the ashes
socialist Phoenix rises from the ashes Sun 14 Sep 2025 07:01:12 No. 1436462 Report This is a good idea as it would cut back on the mass shootings that we see today and we should also make it illegal that mentally ill can't access a computer and go online and this would prevent Facebook anti-vaxers and the ilk from spreading disinformation
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436162 Nadine Dorris joined Reform this week or last week, and she's the author of the internet saftey act. So they've got folks who wrote the thing since it was a Conservative Party bill it just had a 2-year delay on implementation. So the reform party opposes a bill one of them wrote...Its ukip all over again did they learn nothing from brexit...
That said, this bill seems slightly more thought-out than ours in the UK, but I'm not tech-savvy enough to know if it would work. And SCOTUS is totally going to strike this down they are politicians in robes after all.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436118 auth require pam_california_bullshit.so in a file somewhere in /etc/pam.d/. That's if you can't make it a Linux Security Module first.
Then again, I guess this means they technically fulfill the requirement to implement that API. They can't guarantee it'll be turned on, but it's implemented.
Anonymous
>>1436462 >the OS asks for your age when setting up an account >you put in some number 20-30 years ago >that number doesn't get verified because it's not required by the bill >somehow this is supposed to stop kids and anti-vaxers from using the internet Anonymous
>>1436546 Oh no, the bills authors didn't expect Benjamin Button?
I guess we need to go back to the drawing board to figure out what to do for all those folks that turn into children after 20-30 years of being an adult
Anonymous
>>1436552 I don't think you understand
Anonymous
>>1436557 Weird that you understand it enough to know that was wrong, but not enough to know you were wrong.
Pushing back the 18+ age verification to OS level account creation actually makes sure that adults can enforce it, and no one really cares about having to create a new account because you lost your password.
You can just recreate it as 18+ or 21+, dork
Anonymous
>>1436561 >You can just recreate it as 18+ or 21+, dork So if yiu understand that's possible, where along the line did you come up with this Benjamin Button scenario? How exactly do you think this bill would prevent anti-vaxers from being online?
Anonymous
>>1436567 >How exactly do you think this bill would prevent anti-vaxers from being online? Are you so deep into your sunday fent session that you think this was a goal of the bill?
Anonymous
>>1436572 >>1436462 >and this would prevent Facebook anti-vaxers and the ilk from spreading disinformation Anonymous
>>1436581 Oh, I forgot you're retarded and love taking unsourced lies from anonymous retards at face value
Have fun getting angry at things that don't exist?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436593 Anon, I frankly don't know what point you're arguing anymore or if you're the same anon that made that post
socialist Phoenix rises from the ashes
socialist Phoenix rises from the ashes Sun 14 Sep 2025 18:53:30 No. 1436645 Report >>1436546 >you put in some number 20-30 years ago No. The device requires face recognition and a fingerprint to operate
freedom Phoenix rises from the ashes
>>1436645 >The device requires face recognition and a fingerprint to operate Randomly give the government your face ID and your fingerprint to store in their databases...... BIG SISTER come true
Socialist Phoenix rises from the ashes
Socialist Phoenix rises from the ashes Sun 14 Sep 2025 18:57:30 No. 1436649 Report Quoted By:
>>1436648 >Randomly give the government your face ID and your fingerprint to store in their databases. Under our new socialist Utopia, there's nothing to be afraid my comrade.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>1436645 Where does it mention that in the bill?