https://www.axios.com/2020-election-conservative-media-ac7c454a-d8cd-4e3b-b7c5-26359e5e31a0.html The three biggest anti-Joe Biden storylines in right-wing media over the last year have either fizzled or are getting less online traction than they used to, according to data from NewsWhip provided exclusively to Axios.
Why it matters: This dynamic has rendered a formidable media ecosystem less effective in boosting President Trump as we move into the heart of the 2020 campaign.
By the numbers: The data shows that for articles published about Biden since last fall by Fox News, Breitbart, Daily Wire, Daily Caller and Western Journal, articles about Biden's mental acuity, Hunter Biden and Burisma, and Tara Reade's sexual assault accusations have generated the most interactions on social media (likes, comments, shares).
But in recent months, that interest has dissipated:
>Engagement on pieces about Biden's mental sharpness peaked in March and then even higher in June, but has decreased since then. Of the three topics, this has gotten the least combined interest
>Chatter about Hunter Biden serving on the board of a Ukrainian gas company peaked in October, then disappeared by March with a brief spurt in May.
> Interactions on coverage about Tara Reade's allegations against Biden hit a crescendo in late April and early May — reaching a higher peak than any other storyline — before falling away by June.
Overall among these publishers, engagement on all stories about Biden peaked in April and May and has fallen 31% in June and July.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Between the lines: Unlike other storylines that right-wing publishers have feasted on in the past — where new morsels of information reinvigorated news cycles — there have been no new revelations in the Burisma story, and Tara Reade stopped giving press interviews. > By contrast, the drip-drip of information about Hillary Clinton's email server and the DNC leak fueled news cycles for months during the 2016 campaign. Yes, but: That dynamic could change any day at the drop of a hat. The bottom line: This trend underscores Trump's struggle to effectively attack Biden and give him ammunition to turn the focus on his opponent rather than his response to the pandemic.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Russia Continues Interfering in Election to Try to Help Trump, U.S. Intelligence Says https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/07/us/politics/russia-china-trump-biden-election-interference.html WASHINGTON — Russia is using a range of techniques to denigrate Joseph R. Biden Jr., American intelligence officials said Friday in their first public assessment that Moscow continues to try to interfere in the 2020 campaign to help President Trump.
At the same time, the officials said China preferred that Mr. Trump be defeated in November and was weighing whether to take more aggressive action in the election.
Those conclusions were included in a statement released by William R. Evanina, the director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center.
But officials briefed on the intelligence said that Russia was the far graver, and more immediate, threat. While China seeks to gain influence in American politics, its leaders have not yet decided to wade directly into the presidential contest, however much they may dislike Mr. Trump, the officials said.
The assessment by Mr. Evanina suggested the intelligence community was treading carefully, reflecting the political heat generated by previous findings: The White House has objected to conclusions that Moscow is working to help Mr. Trump, and Democrats on Capitol Hill have expressed concern that the intelligence agencies are not being forthright enough about Russia’s preference for him and that the agencies are introducing China’s anti-Trump stance to balance the scales.
The assessment appeared to draw a distinction between what it called the “range of measures” being deployed by Moscow to influence the election and its conclusion that China prefers that Mr. Trump be defeated
Anonymous
Quoted By:
It cited efforts coming out of pro-Russia forces in Ukraine to damage Mr. Biden and Kremlin-linked figures who “are also seeking to boost President Trump’s candidacy on social media and Russian television.” China, it said, has so far signaled its position mostly through increased public criticism of the administration’s tough line on China on a variety of fronts. It is not clear how much China is doing to interfere directly in the presidential election. Intelligence officials have briefed Congress in recent days that much of Beijing’s focus is on state and local races. But Mr. Evanina’s statement Friday suggested China was on weighing an increased effort. “Although China will continue to weigh the risks and benefits of aggressive action, its public rhetoric over the past few months has grown increasingly critical of the current administration’s Covid-19 response, closure of China’s Houston Consulate and actions on other issues,” Mr. Evanina said. Mr. Evanina pointed to growing tensions over territorial claims in the South China Sea, Hong Kong autonomy, the TikTok app and other issues. The release was short on specifics, but that was largely because the intelligence community is intent on trying to protect the sources of their information, said Senator Angus King, the Maine independent who caucuses with the Democrats. “The director has basically put the American people on notice that Russia in particular, also China and Iran, are going to be trying to meddle in this election and undermine our democratic system,” said Mr. King, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. While both Beijing and Moscow have a preference to the outcome of the U.S. presidential election, the Chinese and Russian influence campaigns are very different, officials said. Outside a few scattered examples, it is hard to find much evidence of intensifying Chinese influence efforts that could have a national effect.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Russia, but not China, is trying to “actively influence” the outcome of the 2020 election, the official said. Democrats see the interference campaign run by Russia as a far more direct and urgent threat. “The fact that adversaries like China or Iran don’t like an American president’s policies is normal fare. What’s abnormal, disturbing and dangerous is that an adversary like Russia is actively trying to get a Trump re-elected,” said Jeremy Bash, a former Obama administration official. Russia, tried to use influence campaigns during the 2018 midterm voting to try and sway public opinion, but did not successfully tamper with voting infrastructure. Mr. Evanina said it would be difficult for adversarial countries to try to manipulate voting results on a large scale. But nevertheless, the countries could try to interfere in the voting process or take steps aimed at “calling into question the validity of the election results.” The new release comes on the heels of congressional briefings that have alarmed lawmakers, particularly Democrats. Those briefings have described a stepped-up Chinese pressure campaign, as well as efforts by Moscow to paint Mr. Biden as corrupt. “Ahead of the 2020 U.S. elections, foreign states will continue to use covert and overt influence measures in their attempts to sway U.S. voters’ preferences and perspectives, shift U.S. policies, increase discord in the United States, and undermine the American people’s confidence in our democratic process,” Mr. Evanina said in a statement. Democrats have pushed intelligence officials to release more information to the public, arguing that only a broad declassification of the foreign interference attempts can inoculate voters against attempts by Russia, China or other countries to try to influence voting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
In meetings on Capitol Hill, Mr. Evanina and other intelligence officials have expanded their warnings beyond Russia and have included China and Iran, as well. Earlier this year, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence put Mr. Evanina in charge of election security briefings to Congress and the campaigns. Intelligence and other officials in recent days have been stepping up their releases of information about foreign interference efforts, and the State Department has sent text messages to cellphones around the world advertising a $10 million reward for information on would-be election hackers. How effective China’s campaign has been, or Russia’s efforts to smear Mr. Biden as corrupt, is not clear. Intelligence agencies focus their work on the intentions of foreign governments, and steer clear of assessing if those efforts have had an effect on American voters. The first reactions from Capitol Hill to the release of the assessment were positive. A joint statement by the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee praised the release, and asked colleagues to refrain from politicizing Mr. Evanina’s statement. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, the acting Republican chairman of the committee, and Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the Democratic vice-chairman, said they hoped Mr. Evanina continued to make more information available to the public. But they praised him for responding to calls for more information.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
For right-ring media the belief that Joe Biden is wholly incompetent and creepy has been saturated for the last few months so viewers are probably bored of it. I expect Trump to announce to vote R to open up cities for economic growth pointing towards Norway and Sweden's models moving discussion to economics.
Anonymous
biden is the epitome of lucid thought... right?
Anonymous
>>670427 When your campaign rests entirely on not being the other guy, why would anyone care about your scandals? Biden supporters don't care if he's raped anyone, he's not Trump and that's all that matters. Trump supporters are pretty much the same the other way, everyone who cares has a side figured out already and isn't leaving it.
Anonymous
>>670466 Clinton's campaign boiled down to that, but the Russians and Republicans got months of millage out of her e-mails.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I find it funny that Trump's people admitted the Russians are conspiring with him again. Barr's doing a shitty job of covering up the collusion.
Anonymous
well, the thing is: those all all OBVIOUS lies. the thing with Tara Reade was a hilariously bad lie, but media outlets investigated and reported the shit out of it. they didn't do the same retarded bullshit where they just kept repeating the same accusation. they didn't talk about it unless there were new facts that actually moved the story forward. When nobody would back up Reade's story, reporters were polite about it so as not to appear biased, but they reported what they found. When there was nothing more to say. THEY SAID NOTHING. none of this "Hillary's emails" bullshit for 8 months straight
Anonymous
>>670534 >those all all OBVIOUS lies. Has that stopped the conservative biased media in the past?
Anonymous
>>670466 okay... except the "other guy" is Barak Obama's Vice President, who has had 30 years of experience in the Senate. People know exactly what they are getting with Joe Biden.
and the alternative is Donald Trump. nobody with a working brain is ambivalent about Trump. He is the worst piece of shit to stink up the White House in a century. Biden's campaign is not to be "the other guy" but to charge in the exact opposite direction that Trump has dragged the country. Consider that Trump's entire plan was to just "do the opposite of what Obama did." No intelligence, no forsight. no consideration of the side effects. not even a consideration of what would be a smart use of his power. shit like leaving the Paris Accord or lowering vehicle emmission standards were pointless and did nothing. shit like opening the US for more oil drilling was actually counter productive, in that the glut of oil has actually driven prices below profitability.
Biden will put back in place the treaties and agreements that Obama had set up, and then turn things over to the Progressive caucus. his energy and economic plans are basically the Green New Deal. He has already started building partnerships with people in the Democratic Party to have plans and bills ready to go, Day One.
Trumptards have a lot to worry about. I mean, when Sleepy Joe actually makes America great, they will have no choice but to neck themselves from the shame
Anonymous
>>670546 well... they are still harping on about hydroxychlorowhatsit... but they usually need sorta lies to keep their retarded audience asleep. Stuff like Hunter Biden was just too hard to say with a straight face. Especially when Eric Trump went on Fox to talk about it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670550 Also doesn't help that Trump got impeached over that.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>670447 Probably not. He has made gaffes his whole career.
He has not discussed the importance of the English airfields in 1776. He has also avoided recommending doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as bleach. Trump has done those things.
Anonymous
>>670427 Almost ironic that this is posted here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670427 No one will remember this when Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley issue their biased reports in mid-September. Screencap this.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>670427 So what was HUNTER Biden doing in Ukraine?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670814 Hunting, duh, it's in his name.
Anonymous
>>670812 Yes? I am glad you finally agree.
Trump recommended doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as bleach
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670814 Hunting, if that's a crime then we better prosecute Don Jr since he loves to hunt endangered animals on the taxpayer roll.
Anonymous
>>670427 >MUH RUSSIA God I can't wait to see you fuccbois curling up and crying in November. All you need do is take a look at Biden at any speaking event to see even the most hypnotized democrat is capable of seeing he is practically full-on dementia ridden.
Anonymous
>>670827 >Trump recommended doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as bleach No, he didn't.
Anonymous
>>670846 Yes, he did.
Cope.
Anonymous
>>670854 No, he didn't, and it's a ridiculous thing to fight over. If you're so against Trump, maybe you should care about policies instead of how bad it looks if you both take a quote out of context and misquote it.
Anonymous
Every time sleepy Joe opens his mouth, right wing Russian propaganda comes out.
Anonymous
>>670868 Do Russian propaganda writers also have dementia?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670869 I believe they do. Don't let that fool you though. Sleepy Joe's mind is razor sharp.
Anonymous
https://twitter.com/TheDemCoalition/status/1292182387439407104 Biden with an extremely high IQ move after Trump propaganda network says Biden was unwell.
Now they have to play this clip of Biden riding a bike and looking fit because they got the 'scoop' that Biden has picked his VP.
Anonymous
>>670873 >the people i disagree with are eating up propaganda >also minor cognitive dissonance will make them flip sides The real gaff is Biden's campaign saying the whole thing was a joke.
Anonymous
>>670883 >Joking is bad when it's not Trump threatening the lives of people or America Anonymous
>>670888 >obvious trump jokes should be taken as factual statements >obvious biden factual statements should be taken as jokes Anonymous
>>670866 Yes. He. Did.
I know it triggers special snowflakes, however this is what he said:
“ Trump recommended doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants” such as bleach.
-trump
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>axios Lmao cope harder tranny
Anonymous
>>670899 Who are you quoting? And again, trying to nitpick a quote in a way that only looks good to people who already agree with you is not helping anyone.
Anonymous
>>670894 >obvious trump jokes should be taken as factual statements But Trump says he never jokes.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>ha! none of the smear peices are working! They all dropped off over the last 8 weeks! >p..please ignore the fact that Biden has been dropping hard in the polls over the last 8 weeks!
Anonymous
>>671080 >Biden was polling at 49.7% against Trump on March 5 in the FiveThirtyEight average of the polls. As of Friday, it's 49.9%. Hmmmm...
Anonymous
>>671084 The same polls that said Hillary was going to win, right? Hmmmm
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671086 >i.. its totally not the same this time guys! Only works on people who dont read the polls methodology.
>T... this R +25 D +35 I +30 college educated +60 poll is t..totally representative guys! Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670534 one thing the media learned this time around was to explore all the controversies early on and get them out the way unlike with Hillary
Anonymous
>>671089 Still leading :^)
Anonymous
>>671095 >dropping like a stone in the polls >s..still leading! Okay
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671104 >s... still leading! C O P E
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670447 He's always been a little goofy, but not "testing creates cases, check the manuals and books, you know the books" retarded.
Anonymous
>>670904 >I don’t like the truth because it makes muh trump look like a dementia patient That really sucks for you and your narrative. Trump did suggest doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as bleach. That proves he is fucking stupid. End of line.
Anonymous
>>anyone is actually going to vote for a dead man.
Anonymous
>>671123 a dead man would have made a better president than pretty much all our presidents for the last thirty years
Anonymous
>>671085 yes they did. The butthurt is going to be operatic when the silent majority hands trump a second term - not because they like him, but because Biden represents something much worse.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671148 Thats what’s going to happen! The “silent majority” majority will arise from their 1980s graves and line up to vote!
Meanwhile, in the real world trump is losing Florida, Arizona, and North Carolina.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670845 yes. and the silent majority is scared to death of whatever negress biden picks jumping into the driver's seat as soon as they cart him off to the assisted living center. ONE uppity, angry black woman in the white house was one too many, thanks.
Anonymous
>>671148 >Biden represents something much worse. The 90's Clinton-era political think that Biden represents, wasn't all that bad, and it's an era the populous would almost universally kill to return to, just now.
The silent majority (though I think we should really call them the "voiceless majority", since the media pretends they don't exist, only marketing to either extreme), only fears what the younger more radical kids under him, who were so alienated by his nomination, represent. Question is how much is he going to bend to them to keep his party galvanized, after he's elected, vs. how much he'll stay with the old guard centrist philosophy he was a part of.
Anonymous
>>671124 Clinton was good. He modernized the government and the social welfare system, taxed the upper income bracket, eliminated the budget deficit, removed crony capitalist trade barriers and developed the human capital of the country. A decade or two more of his government could have developed the US into a modern and well-educated first world country with decent public infrastructure and public services. The reactionaries hated him for that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671164 >The reactionaries hated him for that. The Newt Ginrich-led GOP of the 90s would have hated him regardless.
Anonymous
>>671159 The left has gotten so out of control with this cancel culture stuff, they have made /news/ is one of the only places left on the web where people can give their honest opinions. Right or wrong, the majority of people in the US now fear being attacked for sharing their views in public. The cancel culture is only going to become more nazi-like under Biden.
Guru
>>670549 How much does his campaign pay per hour?
Anonymous
>>670427 >this much cope still voting God Emperor
TRUMP 2020
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671174 The salt we're going to mine in November, bro..
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671169 >this month we are afraid of "Cancel Culture" >last month it was trannies and next month we're having a throwback where we blame Muslims like it's 2002. Sounds like a standard election seasons GOP fearmongering scheme.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671172 >pay They do it for free.
Anonymous
>>671169 If you want to say stupid shit then deal with the consequences. Cancel culture doesn't exist, it always blows over eventually because people forget, even the crazy shit Trump does, people eventually forget about it. It sucks for the everyman that loses their job, but I'd fire you too if you were being an asshat on camera. It's my business and I don't want you representing it
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671169 >oh noes! Some retard lost his media job for being a retard, the end is comming Thank god we live in a free country where private companies can fire retards.
Anonymous
>>671169 >The cancel culture is only going to become more nazi-like under Biden. If anything, it might calm down. I suspect a lot of it is a reaction to Trump, being so openly misogynistic, still getting into power, and becoming the most powerful president in history.
People are getting sick of it, and have little to no issues claiming such on MSM and non-anonymized social networks though. I mean, hell, there's several anti-cancel culture tags on Youtube, kids like ShoeOnHead with millions of subscribers, and celebs like Ricky Gervais openly criticizing it.
It'll get better... Maybe.
Though, assuming you're a Republican, you should look on the upside - it's forced the Democrats to shoot themselves in the foot over and over again. A lot of them jumped on the Tara Reade bandwagon, they lost a veteran senator in Al Franken, and outside of politics, the leftist Cosby, and that Jew Weinstein (who I think we can almost universally agree had it coming - though I wish we hadn't lost Miramax in the process).
Anonymous
>>671121 >Trump did suggest doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as bleach This single sentence is the easiest way to identify shills.
Anonymous
>>671203 But you're the shill.
Anonymous
>>671203 >I don’t like it when my hero is shown to be retard Welp, maybe don’t elect retards then.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>671206 >Trump is a retard >because I say he said a thing he didnt say Its not effective
Anonymous
>>671208 >t-trump d-didn’t day w-what he s-said Epic cope.
Trump did in fact suggest doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as bleach.
This is an established fact.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>671213 >>671215 okay shills, very convincing!
Anonymous
>>671222 You are literally shilling right now while you call other people shills.
Anonymous
>671223 >no u! You glow so hard you may as well just buy a trip.
Anonymous
>>671223 >I got btfo Yes, yes you did.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>671227 >I told him he got BTFO again so it means I won my imaginary strawman argument Holy shit you really are 12.
Anonymous
>671230 >*says the pasa* >only shills say this >*instantly starts acting like a shill* Its been over for a long time, I am just here to see how long you keep responding.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671231 I'm imagining an angsty teen telling his mom "You're a shill!" when she tells him to clean his room. That's you.
Anonymous
>671232 >says line everyone on /news/ knows is a shill line >gets called out for it >gets massively butt-hurt, keeps responding even though they have been told they are being baited kek
Anonymous
Why are you even bothering? Whenever you point out the absolutely retarded shit that Trump says, their fallback is always pointless pedantry and whataboutisms so you'd forget what you were even talking about to begin with. Gaslighting is their only solace when confronted with the fact that they're supporting a moronic hypocrite that totally played them by running as an anti-establishment figure.
Anonymous
>>671230 Normal reply from a triggered snowflake.
Anonymous
>>671250 Kneejerk reply from a virtue-signaling reactionary
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671236 Who do you imagine "got called out" ?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671244 One of the worst things you can do to the mentally ill is encourage any delusions they might have that their condition/psychosis is normalized and widespread.
Anonymous
>>671255 Stating that what happened happened is none of those things snowflake.
Trump really did say that doctors/scientists should look into injecting sick people with disinfectants like bleach. Cope with reality.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>671264 >still saying the shill line >thinking it changes literally anyone's mind about literally anything kek
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>Trump said inject bleach! >uhh no he didnt >YES HE DID! >okay post the video >[posts video proving Trump said nothing about injecting bleach] Its an interesting play, Mike, lets see how it works out
Anonymous
lmao.>blames russia. >endorses ching chong bideb
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671275 Do you have trouble reading?
> Trump really did say that doctors/scientists should look into injecting sick people with disinfectants like bleach. This is precisely what anon said. And it pairs with what trump said. Inject people with disinfectants...the ones like bleach (as opposed, I assume, to others). Jesus H Christ you are one dumb snowflake.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>671280 >Arguing Trump said inject bleach when we all just watched a video where he did not say that
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671282 Not him but he clearly did say that and then they showed Dr. Birx's reaction to it.
Anonymous
>671283 >He said inject bleach! >Please ignore the video where he did not say inject bleach.
Anonymous
>>671284 "And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me."
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671284 tough guy who cannot even read English.
Trump really did say that doctors/scientists should look into injecting sick people with disinfectants like bleach.
That statement is correct.
Anonymous
>671285 >"And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me." Thank you for showing that he did not say people should inject bleach.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671285 He is probably the same dude who thinks there really were “fine people” in an overtly racists white nationalist “rally”.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671290 What's it like being isolated in your own reality?
Anonymous
>its now an episode of Shills Greatest hits!
Anonymous
>>671294 Have you ever considered that you act exactly like the shills you rail against?
Anonymous
>>671313 shill inorganically "shill" for a certain viewpoint not argue against an opposing one
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671323 >not argue against an opposing one what is FUD. good job exposing your boomer status this early on, shill
S H I L L
H
I
L
L
Anonymous
>>670549 Biden voted against Medicare for all and is on the same payroll as Trump.
He also voted against expanding Social security and Medicare and told his rich masters that they have nothing to worry about it he wins.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671337 >told his rich masters that they have nothing to worry about it he wins Source? He told me no such thing.
Anonymous
>>670846 From your own article:
>During a coronavirus press briefing, President Trump floated the idea of using disinfectants and sunlight to treat COVID-19 patients. >He was asking officials on the White House coronavirus task force whether they could be used in potential cures. Also from your very own link
> after William Bryan, undersecretary for science and technology at the Department of Homeland Security, presented a study that found sun exposure and cleaning agents like bleach have an adverse effect on the coronavirus. Bryan was referring to the use of disinfectants on surfaces and in aerosols, but Trump asked whether the chemicals could be used in a potential COVID-19 treatment, as well. > cleaning agents like bleach >Trump asked whether the chemicals could be used in a potential COVID-19 treatment, as well. Anonymous
>>671356 Super interesting how nowhere in anything you posted did trump say "inject bleach"
Anonymous
>>671365 >And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning >by injection inside Anonymous
Quoted By:
Russian disinfo is nearly irrelevant compared to mail-in ballots not being delivered to blue areas + "volunteer" groups that will harass voters on election day + the hacking of voting machines
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671365 It's okay to hear extra words that aren't there if Trump is speaking.
Anonymous
>>671372 Silly anon, he didn't LITERALLY SAY to inject bleach, he just said that maybe they could look into getting the killing power of disinfectant inside the body, possibly by injection.
Anonymous
>>671415 I can't tell whether you're trying to be sarcastic or not, but if you're not, what type of disinfectants was he referring to?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671415 trump was just brane-stormin'
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671337 that sleepy joe, he sure is sleepy
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671429 >I can't tell whether you're trying to be sarcastic or not Anonymous
>>671415 This is so sad, I almost want to help you out - in the context, he had just mentioned that bleach is great at killing the virus on surfaces.
But they are right, he never really said it, or suggested it. He did, however, talk like a bumbling idiot, and like a third grader who insists he knows more than the medical experts he's talking to, thinking he can come up with a cure before they do, because he's a renegade supra-genius (just goes to Trump's ego, really). But the Democratic propaganda machine did a piss poor job of pointing that out, and instead has them all repeating the, "inject bleach" soundbite. He did come darn close to suggesting we could stick a UV lamp up your butt, which I suppose is a lesser known, but still incorrect, soundbite.
Then they point to statistics where more people are getting hospitalized from bleach exposure than ever, while ignoring the fact that people are also trying harder to disinfect surfaces than ever.
Anonymous
>>671429 The ones that wipe them out in one minute.
>>671436 Trump is only human and was simply thinking out loud. We all have moments like that, the media drew from what he said something that they knew would generate clicks, and that was what was reported. He NEVER said to inject bleach and even as someone who isn't one of his supporters, you have to admit that reporting a twisted truth is entirely out of bad faith and hurts the media and his criticizers more than it helps because when you really get down to the facts of it all: he never said it.
Anonymous
>>671451 >you have to admit that reporting a twisted truth is entirely out of bad faith and hurts the media and his criticizers more than it helps because when you really get down to the facts of it all: he never said it. Bingo. Anyone who says "He said inject bleach!" immediately discredits themselves and are worthy only of ridicule.
Anonymous
>>671451 >>671453 >Anyone who says "He said inject bleach!" immediately discredits themselves and are worthy only of ridicule. I agree that anyone who uses that line has become a propaganda mouthpiece, on the other hand...
>Trump is only human and was simply thinking out loud. You've lost perspective if you can say that as well. Have you read or listened to those interviews? I mean, any accusations of calling Biden senile fall on deaf ears for a reason.
I suppose if he hadn't slept for a week, I'd excuse talking like that, but he talks like that in the majority of his interviews, and then goes back and defends the drunken rant a few days later.
But maybe it's an act, and he's just trying to prove he's a typical Joe - in that case, however, he has a really shit opinion of the typical Joe.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671457 >You've lost perspective if you can say that as well. Have you read or listened to those interviews? I mean, any accusations of calling Biden senile fall on deaf ears for a reason. I have, and they're embarrassing. I don't support Trump at all, but that whole inject bleach thing really rubbed me the wrong way.
On the human thing, I honestly can't help but pity him on some level since he does get a lot of flak for any and everything. Sometimes rightly so but sometimes unfairly so like again, with the bleach shit. It's just that you can tell when he goes into "normal man" mode and spitballs when he should just shut up (though him saying stupid shit 99.9% of the time when spitballing says a lot...) and then everyone spins and twists those moments into something that can generate clicks and that detracts from his more nefarious actions and also paints those events in a questionable light when it's a fact that the media already twists what he says.
Also, I was totally being sarcastic in
>>671415 Anonymous
>>671457 >I mean, any accusations of calling Biden senile fall on deaf ears for a reason. This is incorrect because the Trump of today speaks and acts like the Trump of 2016. Biden today has clearly changed, even from the primaries he has deteriorated.
Anonymous
>>671465 >acts like the Trump of 2016 You're comparing someone you think has dementia to someone who just "naturally" acts like he also has dementia. Man, this whole situation is just really fucking sad.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671469 I'd agree he's changed a lot since 2006:
https://youtu.be/15djRzWG3_0 (WTF did that guy go!? Can we get him back?)
But he's about the same foddering old man he's been since 2015 or so. Kinda just going where he's pushed, and has lost his fire, to be sure, but holding enough together to remember most of his lines, and hopefully, with assistance, pick out an effective cabinet. Unlike Trump, he isn't an obstinate old prick, and will readily defer to more capable men.
Does kinda feel like we're choosing between two senile old white guys though. Just a matter of whether you want angry grampa or feels grampa.
Anonymous
>>671451 >He NEVER said to inject bleach Who are you quoting? This argument started with the different assertion that
>Trump recommended doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as bleach He has certainly told his scientists to look into using disinfectants, with the disinfectants being the countertop disinfectants mentioned a moment ago, and he has certainly mentioned injections in terms of how to use disinfectants. Everything in this sentence is correct.
>We all have moments like that So that's a permit for him to do it repeatedly on camera, addressing the nation during the crisis? Is it wrong for Biden to speak his unorganized thoughts but not Trump?
Anonymous
>>671485 >Trump recommended doctors look into injecting people with disinfectants such as antimatter Anonymous
>>671488 https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23 Here's the speech transcipt. Bleach was explicitly mentioned around 28 minutes, right before Trump started vomiting his random thoughts:
>We’ve tested bleach, we’ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the virus specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids and I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes. Now where was antimatter explicitly mentioned?
Anonymous
>>671489 Hmm, notice how you don't jump on the alcohol part. In the future, I'd recommend cutting quotes with a [...] so you look less disingenuous.
>We’ve tested bleach, we’ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the virus specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids and I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes. can become
>We’ve tested bleach, [...] on the virus [...] I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes. Or even
>We’ve tested bleach, [...] and I [...] will kill [...] in five minutes. Anonymous
>>671495 If you're trying to imply that injecting alcohol makes the following response by Trump more innocuous, it isn't. Injecting alcohol is far worse than simply drinking it cause it's not going through the digestive system.
Second, what part of my assertions are you contesting? Trump certainly talked about investigating injecting "disinfectants" and bleach was among the disinfectants mentioned in the recent conversation.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>671535 Well, yes, they really should give up on framing Biden as a grabby misogynist or a racist, given the alternative they are presenting. Should probably give up on the senile angle as well. They could cut up some stuff to make him look like a flip flopper, as he is at least as malleable as Kerry and that worked pretty well against him. He's a beta turning gamma, and their counter offer is certainly an alpha.
This bit where we're having Biden simply stating a very well known political fact (that American latinos are more divided than American blanks), is right up there with saying Trump injected with bleach. But the spin doctors in both camps are just getting depressingly immature, as they try to break things down into shorter and shorter sound bites. Seems political attacks have become a minimalist artform. By next election, we'll be down to single letters.
Anonymous
>>671485 > Is it wrong for Biden to speak his unorganized thoughts but not Trump? Think the major difference, is Biden, in addition to generally being better spoken than Trump, doesn't double down when he plumb fucks up. He can laugh at himself, and he can take and apply the advice of experts who know better than he does. Seems to be his primary appeal.
>Just a matter of whether you want angry grampa or feels grampa. Feels more like choosing between Claudius and Caligula... Which I guess means, after this, we get Nero - assuming there's anything left of Rome to burn.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
elections are stupid, every few years we should just choose a random 4chan user to rule.
Anonymous
>Bidementia >Started by Muh Russia! OOGA BOOGA MUH RUSSIA Do the people buying this shit have Goldfish level memory or some shit? Biden having dementia was started by Bernies campaign. No one who was paying attention back then denies this.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672130 Nice try Ivan.
Trump is conspiring with Putin, again.
Anonymous
>>671503 >Trump certainly talked about investigating injecting "disinfectants" and bleach was among the disinfectants mentioned in the recent conversation. Trump certainly talked about investigating injecting "disinfectants" and alcohol was among the disinfectants mentioned in the recent conversation.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/qanon-groups-have-millions-members-facebook-documents-show-n1236317 The conservative bias in social media is much more widespread than we thought.
No wonder Republicans are trying to claim there's a liberal bias, they don't want to lose their own bias edge.
Anonymous
>>670427 >why it matters If your article has to tell you why it matters... maybe it doesn't
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670427 >matters not a coincidence
Anonymous
>>670549 >He is the worst piece of shit to stink up the White House in a century. Obama was in office just a few years ago retard.
Are we now pretending Bush wasn't a disaster as well? So far Trump has started less wars than both of them. He's the best president your country has had in 20 years, (or at least the most anti-war) and that's not an exaggeration, because that's not saying much.
Anonymous
>>672366 Obama's biggest mistake was not prosecuting Bush's war crimes.
If Biden pussies out on prosecuting Trump, you might as well just let the conservatives turn us into a dictatorship like they've been desiring for centuries since rule of law doesn't matter.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
SUPERCope thread. No one cares about Biden scandals because we all see him as a nearly dead joke. If you can't tell he's the same kinda grandpa that touched you when you were little then you're why Hollywood continues to extract money while virtue signaling social justice.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672172 Injecting alcohol is absolutely retarded. It's just going to get you drunk but far faster than just drinking it, might give you alcohol poisoning too. Is that really your defense?
Anonymous
>>671633 How about the fact that Biden is a neo liberal shill?
Anonymous
>>672438 >Obama's biggest mistake was not prosecuting Bush's war crimes. Hard to prosecute your predecessors war crimes when you continue to do everything your predecessor did, including commit the same war crimes
Anonymous
>>672474 The vast majority of Americans are neo-liberal shills. Love it or leave it, bubba.
>>672482 Imagine being such an ideological extremist that you actually believe this.
Anonymous
>>672509 >Imagine being such an ideological extremist that you actually believe this. It's funny how you haven't refuted what they said in any way
Anonymous
>>672474 Of course he is, but all politicians aiming for high office are by necessity. Only real difference is the Democrats are slightly more progressive on social issues. The GOP preaches the gospel of neoliberal economics (even if the can't call them that, because "liberal" is the name), while the Democrats decry all its evils, and implement it anyways. So, if you don't like neoliberal economics, short of leaving the country, best you can do is aim for the party that has some leftists who agree, but who can't make any real headway in the party. (Which just allows Sanders to get close enough to give you the illusion of choice). The other party just touts neoliberal principles as "The American Way", and even among the powerless third parties, most are of that mindset.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672474 People literally want to vote for him because they expect him to just be a puppet for other neoliberals.
Anonymous
>>672573 >Only real difference is the Democrats are slightly more progressive on social issues Although it's not clear how much they really care. It's like how neither side tries to be fully victorious on abortion, they know people care about the issues only while they're in question, a full victory means fewer reasons to vote for you.
Anonymous
>>672517 Which company is passing you to pay this? No way someone is unintentionally this retarded
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672690 >reddit spacing >autocorrect >no argument >calls everyone else a shill Hmmm.
Anonymous
>>670427 Why would you even need to smear Biden? Every time he gets on live camera without a script, the man becomes his own worst enemy.
Anonymous
>>672722 Talking about gaffes is a glass house strategy for Trump given he just admitted he doesn't know when World War II happened today.
Anonymous
>>672735 Downplaying obvious symptoms of dementia as "gaffes" is a glass house strategy by those who actually think Biden is an acceptable improvement over Trump.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672744 When he forgets something or says something totally backwards, that's just a stutter and you're ableist for thinking it's a bad sign.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672744 The only one who has dementia is Trump, look at how he slurs his words and can't remember basic things.
He really needs to retake that one test, but in public.
Anonymous
>>670427 Search google for news on Joe Biden but set google to limit results to 2015 and earlier.
>corrupt corrupt corrupt CORRUPT Anonymous
>>672997 Still not as corrupt as Trump.
Or racist.
Or authoritarian
Or weak
Or senile
Anonymous
>>672997 He is part of the Obama administration. Ofc he is corrupt.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>673069 How many Obama offices were convicted as opposed to the amount among the Trump admin?
Barr's going to get convicted for his crimes so any attempt he made to clear the deck will be voided.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672676 True of both parties - there's a reason it's a wall, and not simply going after the employers. Better symbol, better anger generation, with no risk of actually solving the problem. You'll notice when either party has a supermajority, they do very little on key issues. Democrats didn't go after the second amendment, despite having one for nearly two years, only major legislation they did jam through was a Republican forged and tested health care plan. Similarly, the GOP did next to nothing on immigration, religion, or gay rights when they last had a supermajority. The parties don't thrive on solving problems, they just thrive on the perception that there is a problem, and the other party is going to make it worse - and they, of course, oblige. The more division and salt, the better it is for them, as the more emotionally charged the "debate", the less people are apt to take a step back, and realize for all intents and purposes, they are two sides of the same coin.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>673025 Are we in the same universe? Biden literally fades to the shadow realm every other word
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671164 >eliminated the budget deficit, no, he just got lucky that the internet bubble coincided with his term in office.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671181 >It's my business and I don't want you representing it this is what /biz/ would describe as ngmi.
zuckerberg didn't cave to boycotts. there's no such thing as bad publicity. if your biz folds to some tweets REEEEEing, you got a shitty business that was gonna fold anyway.
Anonymous
>>671202 >I suspect a lot of it is a reaction to Trump ask /g/ and /v/, this started long before trump. normalfags on the social media was a mistake. data-miners tricked advertisers into thinking children have purchasing power.
Anonymous
>>671635 >Claudius >From Wikipedia: >Numerous edicts were issued throughout Claudius' reign. These were on a number of topics, everything from medical advice to moral judgments. A famous medical example is one promoting yew juice as a cure for snakebite. If you're implying that Biden will be Claudius, that's not much of an improvement.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
vote for biden or you ain't black, boy!
Anonymous
>>673170 Well, Trump, in part, was a reaction to it to begin with, but the two feed on one another, so both are in overdrive now.
>>673241 That was indeed the point.
Take your pick:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmum3glL1DA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMKSwcZNpd8 Caligula's more fun at parties though, and that's what a large part of what America votes on - who they'd rather have a beer with.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>673312 >Caligula's more fun at parties though, and that's what a large part of what America votes on - who they'd rather have a beer with. lol. i remember back in 2000, gore was running against bush. people perceived gore to be an uncharismatic robot a la zuckerberg, so gore lost. then they showed gore dancing at the post election concession party (or maybe shjortly after like new years eve, i don't recall). then everybody from leno to snl flipped and said where was that guy last month, i'd have voted for party gore. can't find the video now
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>673241 Doesn't sound like Biden:
>Numerous edicts were issued throughout Trump's reign. These were on a number of topics, everything from medical advice to moral judgments. A famous medical example is one promoting hydroxychloroquine juice as a cure for COVID-19. Anonymous
Anonymous
Hunter Biden founded BHP Partners ltd. which
>invested in Sinopec >bought a Congolese copper mine for some of that sweet conflict resource blood money Here's how well the workers there at Tenke Funguruma like their Chinese overlords btw:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3A219N6raQ >bought Megvii, which makes facial recognition software for CCP mass surveillance and genocide of minorities >invested in CGN, a nuclear power company that steals its tech from competitors on behalf of the Chinese govt They raised at least $2B over the years, 450k on his tax returns smells like tax evasion, and Hunter proclaiming "we never got paid" is a clever lie disguising his stake, which he's not (but should be) required to sell, in which case he's get like $100-200M, probably upon successfully CCP takeover of the WH. Facts.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>673441 You're assuming anyone who thinks Biden is worth voting for cares about this.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>670427 The October Surprise is an indictment against a current Political Figure.... Hmmm who can that be?????
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>671148 The same silent majority that flipped likely Republican state senate seat in SC to democrat by 20 points?
Anonymous
The Russians and the co-conspirators among the Trump campaign can't even think of a coherent narrative against Harris other than conspiracy theories or overt racism. BTW, Newsweek is now a far right publication.
Anonymous
>>674390 >other than conspiracy theories or overt racism Anything they say would always be disregarded by libs like that.
Anonymous
>>670427 lol, now thats funny and stupid
Biden is a joke nobody has to make smear campaigns against this retarded puppet.
Anonymous
>>674390 you must be a fucking moron. the media ignores "heels up" harris' history of fucking & sucking to advance her career.
Anonymous
the only "smear campaign" going on is trying to clean up joe's underpants.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>674619 >Implying Birtherism isn't an overtly racist conspiracy theory. Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>675864 You know lefties, the people that say 2+2=5.
Facts and news they dont like are all right wing propaganda.
Even math is white supremacist to these people. At that point, you already know their brains are rotten beyond the point of no return.
Anonymous
>>671104 Like fucking Hillary you dumb ass.
Nugget
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672690 Learn English moron
It's funny how you haven't refuted what they said in any way
Anonymous
>>670427 >I know guys, lets do a demoralization thread from the perspective of 'weve already won' instead of 'youve already lost'! That'll work! Holy shit dude, sit down and shut up. Elections are in a few months, all speculation is just glowie bullshit trying to help rig the election, one way or the other.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>676536 >stop paying attention to math! You are the glowie bullshit
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672474 That'd be the same "so is Trump", bit - though it at least cuts out the middleman with him. Neoliberal shills only care about the rich, while Trump, is the rich, and only cares about himself. So it all works out.
Anonymous
>russia, but not china These people actually expect us to believe Chinks have no skin in the game when Bidden is a known fren to Chinese investors and Trump has spent 3 years fucking the chinks up the ass.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>676657 Trump fucking China up the ass, has involved tariffing parts and raw materials our companies buy on the cheap to thrive. Meanwhile, China retaliates by tariffing agricultural goods, that are nothing but a loss for them, undermining their market. Basically, he's been fucking us both in the ass, and hoping China would break first...and when the ass fucking finally ended? We got nothing. No concessions on human rights, no concessions on Iraq or the Norks, next to nothing on IP or market manipulation, and nothing on currency manipulation.
Beyond that, he's banned WeChat and TikTok in the US, both of which mean nothing to China, economically, but it sure hurts their pride, and makes the Internet feel he's still "being tough on China".
Which has pretty much been Trump's MO during his whole rule - he's more concerned about making it feel like he's doing something, than actually doing something. Whether that be building a wall, instead of going after employers, or treating COVID like a political hoax.
Anonymous
>>671121 All your demented accusations have insured Trump another 4 years.
Cheers
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>676473 And just like last time, Trump needs to cheat to win :^)
Same old Republican election fraud.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670427 Whatever you say lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady lady...
Anonymous
>>676657 Except Trump handed Hong Kong over to the Chinese on a silver platter.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>677523 >implying the accusations aren't correct What a great trick to get gullible people like you to defend him for free.
>>677523 Do you think OP made it up?
Anonymous
>>671337 >Biden voted against Medicare for all Because it's a pipe dream that not even the majority of Americans want after finding out the details
>told his rich masters that they have nothing to worry about it he wins. Yes, as in their quality of living will not suddenly go down the shitter because he raises some taxes.
Then again you porbably know what you're doing, you snake.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>677923 >69% of 958 people surveyed FTFY
Anonymous
>>677921 >Because it's a pipe dream Amazing how many other countries are happily living this pipe dream, or at least close enough to it to solve a lot of problems.
>>677799 I don't really know what you expected him to do beyond this though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>677926 >what is a representative sample Assuming a proper sample, that's still a >99.999% chance it's the majority of the population overall.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>672366 >Are we now pretending Bush wasn't a disaster as well? Bush has been rehabilitated by the libs to try to own Trump. Now he paints pictures of immigrants and that makes all the people who died because of him and Cheney a non-issue somehow.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>677927 >Amazing how many other countries are happily living this pipe dream thanks to millions of dollars in financial support from the US ensuring they don't have to pay for their own national defense FTFY
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>677923 As I said, after finding out the details
https://apnews.com/4516833e7fb644c9aa8bcc11048b2169 >The poll found that Americans initially support “Medicare-for-all,” 56 percent to 42 percent. >However, those numbers shifted dramatically when people were asked about the potential impact, pro and con. >But if they were told that a government-run system could lead to delays in getting care or higher taxes, support plunged to 26 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Support fell to 32 percent if it would threaten the current Medicare program. Oops
>>677927 Majority of those countries don't have private health insurance abolished, which is what M4A wants to do.
Anonymous
>>670427 Why do people still believe in the Russia hoax? It's scary that you can just make something up to overthrow an elected president.
Anonymous
>>677972 Maybe because it's not a hoax and it isn't going away. Trump actually did the bad things he is accused of.
Anonymous
>>677972 Because Biden is bombing and the DNC is unable to come up with a clear vision to campaign on so they need something to carry them for the next ~80 days.
>>677974 *yawn*
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>670466 Bullshit, people are not against the DNC simply because biden is running.
The DNC is anti-white and anti-American.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>677974 If that was the case the left would have provided evidence instead of just spreading fallacies and fake news.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670427 wait. sleepy joe is now a president?
Anonymous
They have already proven the left was doing what they were accusing Trump of doing. WITH EVIDENCE
Anonymous
>>670427 it's a, "say and claim the exact opposite of what is true thread". I want off this hell world.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678198 I'd say it's pretty much right. Political-Americans are divided enough that no smears are working too well on anyone. At this point most people who "care" about politics don't really care about their side's shortcomings too much.
>>677978 >i don't hate the other guy, i just hate the other party he's a part of Same difference.
Anonymous
>>677927 Maybe at least condemn the action instead of siding with them Chinese?
Hell You had Trump beg the Chinese leader to help him in his reelection so that explains his real motives of being against them.
Anonymous
>>678257 >so that explains his real motives of being against them. Yes, nothing China does could possibly be against the interests of anyone else in the world and Trump never ever mentioned China before then.
Biden still ain’t gonna win
lol at the effort you ppl are trying to put in to make Biden/harris look legit. Y’all are strait up deceptacons Trump 2020 Or Kanye 2020 Tulsi 2024
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678274 >Kanye 2020 >Tulsi 2024 I'll take it. The DNC will implode.
Anonymous
>>678005 where is that evidence?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678292 Likely from his crap covered Russian ass.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678273 >implying strawman Anonymous
Anonymous
>Right wing media has been hammering away at Biden's mental fitness for months >He gives a solid speech >Now the right wing are bitching and moaning about how low the bar they set for him.
Anonymous
>>678375 maybe Joe Biden will slip up and brag about passing a dementia test
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678377 Trump better take another test, he keeps forgetting about all the people who helped commit crimes for him.
Anonymous
>>678375 The fact that you are bragging about Biden completing a speech tells us everything we need to know about his mental state.
Anonymous
>>678388 >Strawman I'm mocking your side's tactical blunder.
Anonymous
>>678389 >tactical blunder Biden is down bigly in the polls and as I pointed out you have now resorted to bragging about your candidate completing a speech without gaffe.
Its working as intended.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670549 you sound pretty mad bro, hate to think how you will feel when trump wins again.
Anonymous
>>678394 Still leading :^)
And that lead's going to grow after the Trump virus starts killing more people due to preemptively opening the schools and the Trump depression hits.
Better find a new way to steal the election since people are now avoiding the post office to get their votes in absentee :^^^^)
Anonymous
>>678397 >Still leading :^) I would expect nothing less than a childish non-response to the fact that Bidens June lead has more than halved and that he is now tied with Trump in key swing states.
Anonymous
>>678398 What creditable polls even say that?
Anonymous
>>678399 The aggregates on RCP
Anonymous
>>678402 >aggregate I sad creditable.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670476 Yeah but Clinton was kind of detested even by democrats. Even if Biden is ambivalent that's still a hell of a lot better than disgust.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678405 >yet another childish non-response Aggregates are more credible than individual polls.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670427 >Leftoids so desperate they call Rose McGowan a Russian asset Biden drops dead in October, it'll be kino.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678388 I sure would be interested in exactly what kind of experimental Alzheimer's drug they got him on.
Anonymous
>>678388 You mean like how everytime Trump completes a prepared speech, his supporters praise him for not rambling incoherently?
Anonymous
>>678414 Trump has been rambling incoherently for over 20 years and rambled incoherently into the whitehouse.
Nice try at conflating the two, its not going to work.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>678422 Doesn't sound like a senile fart who lost his mind is worse than the current potus then, whether that describes Biden or not.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
DEBATE! DEBATE! DEBATE!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>670427 >Metrics from social media indicated... Retarded speculation boys... Terrible waste of time