More tapes of Trump committing election fraud.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/recording-of-trump-phone-call-to-georgia-lead-investigator-reveals-new-details-11615411561 ATLANTA—Then-President Donald Trump urged the chief investigator of the Georgia Secretary of State’s office to look for fraud during an audit of mail-in ballots in a suburban Atlanta county, on a phone call he made to her in late December.
During the six-minute call, which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Trump repeatedly said that he won Georgia. “Something bad happened,” he said.
“When the right answer comes out, you’ll be praised,” Mr. Trump told the chief investigator, Frances Watson.
She responded: “I can assure you that our team and the [Georgia Bureau of Investigation], that we are only interested in the truth and finding the information that is based on the facts.”
The Washington Post reported on the call in January, but this is the first time the recording has been released.
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has launched a criminal investigation into alleged efforts to have officials in Georgia overturn the state’s results of November’s presidential election. In a February letter to officials, Ms. Willis said a grand jury would convene this month.
In early January, media outlets, including the Journal, published news of a recording of a telephone conversation between Mr. Trump and several supporters and Mr. Raffensperger and his staff. During that Jan. 2 call, Mr. Trump urged Mr. Raffensperger to “find” votes to change the election outcome. He berated Mr. Raffensperger for not doing more to overturn the election.
Representatives of the former president didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
President Biden won the state by about 12,000 votes out of 5 million cast. Two statewide recounts confirmed Mr. Biden won, making Mr. Trump the first sitting Republican president to lose the state since 1992.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
After the recounts, the Georgia Secretary of State conducted a forensic audit of about 15,000 mail-in ballots in Cobb County, checking signatures on ballot envelopes to make sure they matched signatures on file with the county. It was during that audit, just before Christmas, that Mr. Trump called Ms. Watson. Mr. Trump said in the call that he contacted Ms. Watson at the request of Mark Meadows, Mr. Trump’s chief of staff. The audit found no evidence of fraud.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Mr. Raffensperger’s spokesman Ari Schaffer said in a statement to the Journal: “This phone call is just one more example of how Secretary Raffensperger’s office’s public comments also reflect what was said in one-on-one conversations: We would follow the law, count every legal vote and investigate any allegations of fraud. That’s exactly what we did, and how we arrived at the accurate final vote tally.”
For months after the election, Mr. Trump and his supporters pressed for the Georgia results to be overturned. Mr. Trump directed much of his ire at Republican leaders in Georgia, including Gov. Brian Kemp and Mr. Raffensperger.
The White House forced the U.S. attorney in Atlanta to resign after he declined to launch a federal investigation into the Georgia election, according to people familiar with the matter.
In February, Ms. Willis sent letters to top Georgia officials, including Mr. Raffensperger, ordering them to preserve records relating to the 2020 election. The letters stated that Ms. Willis’s office had launched a criminal investigation into “potential violations of Georgia law prohibiting solicitation of election fraud, the making of false statements to state and local bodies, conspiracy, racketeering, violation of oath of office and any involvement in violence or threats related to the election’s administration.”
-----
New: Records we obtained show an aide to then Chief of Staff Mark Meadows contacted Georgia’s Deputy Sec. of State Jordan Fuchs on Dec. 30 as the Trump White House was pressuring Georgia to illegally overturn the election result.
https://www.americanoversight.org/document/georgia-secretary-of-state-email-regarding-mark-meadowsvisit-to-cobb-county Also this isn't the first time Trump committed Election fraud in Georgia
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html Anonymous
Republicans will never have a president again after this
Anonymous
>>805990 Yup
Is this even legal? Using official office to pressure officials into changing election results, on word alone? Isn't that like, what putin does?
Anonymous
>>806011 No. Putin doesn't lose the vote
Anonymous
>>806011 He already broke the law when he called the Georgia secretary of state to get him to steal the election for him, I'm sure you could apply the crimes he committed in that call to this one.
Under 52 U.S.C. § 20511, it is a crime for, “A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office … knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by … the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held.” In this case, Mr. Trump, for purposes of a federal election, solicited Secretary of State Raffensperger to procure ballots that are known to be false by threatening him to “find 11,780 votes.”
Under 52 U.S.C. § 10307(a), “No person acting under color of law shall … willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person’s vote.” During the phone conversation, Mr. Trump, under color of law, solicited Secretary of State Raffensperger to re-tabulate or “recalculate” the votes, which would have deprived Georgia voters of the accurate count of their votes.
Also the fact he did it multiple times shows criminal intent unless Trump's defense is he's delusional and actually believes he won. Which would then bring him an entirely new shitshow.
Anonymous
>>805929 >still talking about Trump sad
>>805990 Thats where you're wrong, kiddo.
Anonymous
>>806016 >Not holding a criminal accountable for his crimes sad
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>this time we will get him for sure!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806034 >Thinking Trump cover bands have the same sway as Trump. It's called a cult of personality for a reason.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>I.. it's a cult of personality! >No way the America first agenda could resonate with so many millions of Americans!
Anonymous
>Cults can't be big >He doesn't know about organized religion
Anonymous
>it's a cult! >No, lots of people like the policy platform >it's a big cult!
Anonymous
>>806051 That will never happen.
Wrongthinkers will be gulaged until only the perfect patriotic communists remain
Anonymous
>>806054 >Wrongthinkers will be gulaged until only the perfect patriotic communists remain You're literally describing what Trump's immigration policy was about.
Anonymous
>>806077 Trump and his Reichsführer-SS Stephen Miller sadistically enjoyed torturing brown women and children.
Anonymous
>>805929 How's Trump's dick taste?
Quoted By:
MEDIA LIE.REPORTERS LIE.NEWSPAPERS LIE.THE ONLY ONE WITH ALL THE PROOF AND THE TRUTH IS ME.I WAS CHOSEN TO RELEASE THE DOCUMENTS AND FILES FOR A REASON.CORRUPTION IN THE CIA,FBI,GOVERNMENT AND HOLLYWOOD,THIS INCLUDES MANY OTHER ELITES. COPS,THE RED CROSS,EMTS,NURSES,DOCTORS,LAWYERS, JUDGES,FIREMEN,SPORTS PLAYERS AND MANY IN
MEDIA.IT 'S ABOUT ANDRENOCHROME.CORRUPTION,TRAFFICKING AND CHILD SACRIFICE.LET'S NOT FORGET PERVERSION. NO DENYING BIBLICAL
PROPHECY.NO MATTER WHAT ANYONE
REPORTS.TO THINK A PEDOPHILE WITH DEMENTIA COULD RUN A COUNTRY,MUCH LESS BE COMMANDER AND CHIEF,IS JUST RIDICULOUS. THINK FOR YOURSELF.YOU ARE WATCHING A SHOW OF THE CORRUPT AND THE GUILTY.PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP HAS A SUPERIOR HIGH IQ. THIS HAS BEEN PLANNED OUT SINCE H$E CAME DOWN THE ESCALATOR.THE RADICAL LEFT ARE SORE LOSERS. THIS WAS NOT A PANDEMIC BUT IT WAS PANDEMONIC. WAKE UP!!!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806018 ONE OF THESE DAYS HE'S REALLY GOING TO GET IT
meanwhile
>2021 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806094 Idk, but I do know his zombie cultists salivate at the idea of trying it.
>>806085 Anonymous
>>806049 Organized religions aren't cults, at least in colloquial definition.
Anonymous
>>806174 >They aren't if you don't follow the rules and definition of one REALLY?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Funny how some think he will be charged. Stop giving.this orange stain the spot light. Let him fade away
Anonymous
>>806251 The colloquial meaning of the word cult is a group which exists to venerate and serve a cult leader at the expense of the cult members. If you want to use the broad definition of cult, then yes all religion would be a cult. However, given the loaded nature the term has taken on in the past century, it seems prudent to make a distinction between an organized religion and a cult run by a narcissistic, charismatic cult leader.
Anonymous
>>806313 The Roman orgine of the world simply means the observance of religious rituals and the religious calendar.
Anonymous
>>806316 Yes. I brought that up and gave my reason for why that definition may not be appropriate given modern usage of the word. Did you not read the post? The defintion of words are refined over time and change depending on their common usage. Pedantically adhering solely to the original definition prevents the natural evolution of language.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806322 At least we can all agree that Trumpism is a cult - and not like a happy, hand out handmade necklaces at the airport and sing songs in the woods cult. Like a full blown, unhinged, teeth-gnashing, die-for-the-glory-of-the-cause death cult.
Anonymous
>>806313 That's organized religion though, espically American versions like the prosperity gospel. Unless you believe there is a psychological benefit towards it.
Anonymous
>>805929 It was the opposite, Kemp and GA officials were all corrupt former ES&S employees who got Kemp elected fraudulently, when this raised concerns he switched to DVS. Trump at this point was probably aware of the ongoing fraud, and pressured Kemp to do the right thing ie to not go along with the mass vote switching.
Anonymous
>>806332 >Especially American versions Oh, so you are conflating offshoot cults which use mainstream religion as an entry point to manipulate their followers with actual mainstream religions. Got it. And yes, religion can provide comfort to some individuals. The problem is that the promise of comfort can lull people into joining harmful cults of they are not careful. However, to claim that all religions are inherently harmful to the individual or society because these small cults exist is disingenuous at best.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806338 No, just no. Seriously, Trump was BTFO in GA and was instrumental in and responsible for the defeat of the GOP Senate candidates when they stupidly clutched at his loser coattails. A likely preview of 2022 if the milquetoast GOP continues to worship at the altar of conceivably the most despised politician in the history of the US who was not only served 2 scoops of impeachment, but provoked and incited his zombie cult to attempt an overthrow of US Democracy to have himself crowned King for Life.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806338 At this point, I don't even believe that you guys believe this shit.
Anonymous
>>805990 >>806011 >>806013 >>806015 The media and the democrats conspire to spin the truth and create narratives that are supposed to hurt trump. The videos that the democrats played and replayed a hundred times during the second impeachment trial to try to make it sound like trump incited and insurrection were straight up cut short to hide the full context of what Trump was saying. Trump's lawyer played the full clips with the full context to show that trump plainly wasn't inciting an insurrection, and that the democrats purposely hid that fact, and the media conspired to spin the truth with the democrats. The media has been wrong every time because they've lied every time but still some people keep listening to them. They were wrong about the russia hoax, they were wrong about trump inciting an insurrection, Trump isn't a racist, or a rapist, or any of the things the media and democrats have conspired to cry wolf about. This is my long winded explanation to you why this phone call is nothing new. They've spun the truth about multiple phone calls before. Whatever the media claims, the opposite is true. A corrupt phone call? Actually it's a wholesome phone call about protecting our election integrity. No evidence of fraud? Actually hella evidence of fraud. No pedophile devil cult? Actually there's a giant pedophile devil cult.
Anonymous
>>806365 I can't tell if you're memeing or not.
Anonymous
>>806372 He's just parodying the Dear Leader/Q zombie cultists.
Anonymous
>>806372 >>806375 >The truth is meta now You call people who like trump cultists because you think they'll follow him despite all the evil things he's supposedly done but really he isn't the supervillain the media and democrats have conspired to make him out to be. The best example I can give you of their blatant lying is the second impeachment trial, where all trump's lawyer had to do was play a few clips for a few seconds longer than the democrats did to prove that trump didn't incite an insurrection, so trump wasn't impeached. They've been spinning the truth since the beginning.
Anonymous
>>806381 7 Republicants voted to convict in the 2nd impeachment trial and even many of those who voted not to convict admitted he was responsible for inciting the coup attempt and criminally malfeasant in not attempting to stop it until hours later, and then only half heartedly while still promoting the Big Lie. They also acknowledged the House managers made a solid compelling case for his guilt. Most said they voted not to convict because he was no longer President, but also they were scared for their families safety given anyone that looked cross eyed at Trump received death threats. That's what happens when a Dear Leader has rabid zombie cultists as his base.
So his guilt was acknowledged by everyone except those like Hawley, Cruz and a few others who were complicit in the incitement. That's the reality cultist and no amount of gaslighting by you or the rightwing echochamber bobblehead mouthpieces of Sauron will change that fact.
Anonymous
>>806365 Wew lad, that some industrial strength copium you got there.
Anonymous
>>806388 You're paying attention to what politicians said and voted and you aren't paying attention to the case trumps lawyer made. Again, all Trumps lawyer had to do was play the same clips the democrats were playing, but for a few seconds longer. The point I made is that the democrats were blatantly lying by not playing the full clips. I don't need any politician to think for me. I don't need anyone in Congress to explain to me what happened because I saw what happened with my own two eyes. The democrats purposely cut off the video before the full context of what Trump was saying was clear, so trump's lawyer played the full clip and voila Trump was not impeached.
Anonymous
>>806393 The democrats spun the truth by not paying the full clips. Prove me wrong. Pro tip: you can't
Anonymous
>>806394 >Trump was not impeached False. Not convicted. He was impeached twice, forever.
Anonymous
>>806365 >The media and the democrats conspire to spin the truth and create narratives that are supposed to hurt trump. This much is true, no doubt
I'd hate to use the old "but both sides are doing it" argument but it's absolutely true
We live in an era of unprecedented propaganda, lies, and deceit being used to attack the American people by the corporations that own both the Democrat and the Republican parties
What we are witnessing is a positive feedback loop.
Both parties push their propaganda on us, through whatever fate the business sectors that control media are massive donors to one side and not the other.
And the more the media sector is pushing the agenda of those they control (ie their own agenda) the more donors are moving over to the same side of the field.
And these additional mega donors moving over or now funneling their mega bucks into the same place
so it's basically all one giant feedback loop at this point spiraling out of control
... Unless of course that you're on the side of the fence that actually believes that everybody on the opposing side of your political view is in fact a racist fascist nazi, in which case you are the exact tool of a person this sort of thing targets
Anonymous
>>806395 What do you think the full clips show that wasn't shown by the dems?
Anonymous
>>806410 You're right. He was impeached, but not convicted, because he didn't incite an insurrection like the democrats and media lied about.
>>806412 Spare twelve minutes of your time to find out.
https://youtu.be/nt6wFNGVaKc Anonymous
>>806411 Enlightened centrism should be classified in the DSM-5 as a mental illness.
Anonymous
>>806416 Need more reasons to put your countrymen in gulags? Typical leftist fool. Commies get the rope.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>805990 and republicans will never have a president after watergate
we have been here before
keep dreaming kid one day it will come true
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806423 >Need more reasons to put your countrymen in gulags? Oh no, comrade. This is all for you. If we can classify it as a mental illness then all you dipshits can get the psychiatric treatment you so desperately need after we reform healthcare.
>Typical leftist fool. Commies get the rope. You have no idea what any of the words you just said mean.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806423 >Commies rent free
theonemirroereflectsitsself
Quoted By:
>>806416 >Enlightened centrism should be classified in the DSM-5 as a mental illness Having stuck in sand syndrome should be defined in Websters as See no, Speak no, hear no reality, because I'm a fool.
theonemirroereflectsitsself
>>806365 >Having stuck in sand syndrome should be defined in Websters as See no, Speak no, hear no reality, because I'm a fool. Anonymous
>>806488 Are you trying to say my head is stuck in the sand? I linked a video of reality. The democrats selectively edited reality. Do you want to try to argue that they didn't selectively edit those clips? Because they did. What's my head stuck in the sand from? Educate me instead of calling me a fool. I don't want to be a fool and I don't want to act like I know anything to make people think I'm smart or something. I genuinely want to know what's going on in the world so please help me with that. Teach me something right now.
Anonymous
>>806349 >Cults can't have their own versions of cults Why are you so vested in defending cults?
Anonymous
>>806652 Your green text makes no sense, which is as good of an example of my point as I could have asked for. I'm defending the evolution of language, not cults. Why are you so opposed to this?
Anonymous
>>806581 The case was conclusively made with evidence beginning months before the election when he was screeching the only possible way he could lose was through fraud. And he and his minions built the Big Lie bigger and louder daily, to a screaming cacophonic crescendo after the election, after 60+ lost court cases, after multiple recounts/audits climbing to a climax of taped phone calls of him extorting election officials to commit election fraud and reaching the pinnacle of his infamous speech with supporting choruses by Ghouliani, Don Jr. and others inciting his zombie cult to attempt to overthrow Democracy and assasinate leaders, and refusing to take any action to try to stop it even with desperate phone calls from his loyal sycophants under attack begging him to do something. And the denoument, ours after it began, released a lackadaisical video still promoting the Big Lie, telling the insurrectionist terrorists he loved them and in almost a whisper saying, " but you have to go home now."
Get over it cultist, even Trump lickspittles admitted the House Managers proved the guilt of the Orange Fool conclusively. They just thought you can't convict an ex-President. You lost, snowflake, wake up!
Anonymous
>>806717 You typed a lot but didn't address the only point I've been making which is that the democrats selectively edited footage. See the link here
>>806415 Did they, or did they not, selectively edit footage? Yes they did, and that's my evidence that they've been doing that sort of thing since trump was campaigning in 2016. Why would someone in our congress, who is deciding on policy for our country, selectively edit footage like that? Why would the mainstream media play those same selectively edited clips? And never play the full clips? Because the democrats, and the msm, and big tech conspire together towards common goals, one of those goals being to demonize trump and control people's perception of him.
Anonymous
>>806757 >didn't address the only point I've been making Your point is meaningless since as I pointed out, that tape was one piece of the evidence which stretched back months before the election and continued even while the attempt to overthrow Democracy was occuring that conclusively proved Trump was guilty as charged as even his sycophantic Senators agreed. As far as Trump being selectively edited to make him look like a solipsistic naricissist demon spawn from hell, live news conferences, unedited tweets and his own public record activities were not edited. Admit it, he was and is a criminal and an unmitigated disaster on every front, except inspiring white nationalists/supremacists to believe they have his support. Take the orange zombie antidote my dude.
Anonymous
>>806768 Idk why you're talking to me like that. We can have a regular discussion without all that. Idk why it's so personal for you.
>Congressman lying is meaningless You haven't refuted my one and only point. The democrats did in fact selectively edit footage to make it look like trump was saying something that he wasn't saying, that's called lying. Can you admit that the democrats selectively edited those clips? Or do you think they didn't selectively edit those clips?
Anonymous
>>806694 How does it not make sense? A cult can break off from another cult and make their own cult.
Anonymous
>>806779 >selectively edit footage to make it look like trump was saying something that he wasn't saying It was not the right's favorite tactic of creating "deep fakes." The tapes showed clearly what Trump was urging his cult to do by his own words and it's reflected in almost every one of the 300 insurrectionist terrorists stating that they were inspired and motivated by Trump to violently overthrow Democracy and hold elected leaders accountable in some cases by execution, so he could be Emperor.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806804 >300 Several thousand actually. Don't know why the DoJ is sitting on their ass and not arresting everyone who attacked capitol.
Anonymous
>>806796 Is that what you were getting at by "Cults having their own version of cults?" But sure, the Branch Davidians were an offshoot of the 7th Day Adventists who were themselves an offshoot of the Millerites. Cult leaders poach members from rival cults all the time as the power dynamic shifts. What is your point? It doesn't change the fact that the word "cult" has taken on a more specific meaning in the past century or so and pedantically holding onto the antiquated definition is stifling the natural evolution of language.
Anonymous
>>806811 They're all cults, don't see what that's so hard to understand.
Anonymous
>>806812 Only in the broadest, antiquated definition of the word. It has taken on a more specific and targeted meaning in modern times. I don't see why that is so hard for you to understand.
Anonymous
>>805929 Nothing will come of this.
Nor his taxes, except maybe a fine.
Anonymous
>>806804 >blatantly rig the election >accuse anyone who wants a fair investigation and accountability of being against democracy If I can say one good thing about you people, you've got some balls.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806804 >The tapes clearly showed.. No they didn't. The democrats purposely left out the full context of what Trump was saying. So, to be clear, you think that the democrats weren't leaving anything important out of those videos that they played as evidence? Link the video of trump saying anything that sounds like he's inciting an insurrection. If it was so clearly showed, then you should be able to show it.
Anonymous
>>806815 >If you don't follow the definition Into the trash your argument goes.
Anonymous
>>806819 >60+ lawsuits >multiple recounts and audits >Republican election officials of challenged States many of whom were avowed Trump supporters adamantly declare no fraud >head of DOJ toady Barr, Trump's own bootlicker extraordinaire states unequivocally no wide spread fraud that would have changed the results >head of cyber security states there was no breach or compromise of voting machines >b-but muh Dear Leader s-said so a-and everybody conspired to hurt his delicate feefees and make him lose. Waaaahhh, waaaaaahhhh! Get over it snowflake, find a new conspiracy theory to slobber about.
Anonymous
>>806852 If you are using the term cult as a pejorative, you aren't following the defintion.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>806818 The only Trump gets out of the crimes he committed in Georgia is if Kemp pardons him or interferes in the investigation. Both are extremely likely.
And that just shows Trump is a criminal, but the Republicans are also criminals
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>806878 Ten bucks says you're not gonna read any of this:
https://hereistheevidence.com/ Anonymous
>>807125 Anecdotes are not evidence.
Anonymous
>>807132 There's a lot more than anecdotes there, snowflake. Try reading.
Anonymous
>>807134 >m-muh anecdotes a-are the Quaken! Only 2 more weeks, guys and our glorious God Emperor resumes the throne! Ok, myPillowguy, lol!
By the way affidavits are admissible evidence in a court of law
By the way affidavits are admissible evidence in a court of law Sun 14 Mar 2021 16:05:58 No. 807152 Report >>807139 >Wisconsin SCOTUS rule Executive Branch misused "indefinitely confined" >https://rfangle.com/politics/trump-wisconsin/ >This is just an anecdote >2,000 ballots found in single sweep, despite numerous prior sweeps >https://archive.is/KaXwK >This is just an anecdote >70% of Detroit's 134 absentee counting boards had unexplained counting errors >https://eu.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/17/wayne-county-canvassers-deadlock-certifying-november-3-election-results/6324274002/ >This is just an anecdote For your sake, I hope whoever you're trying to convince is as retarded as you're pretending to be.
Anonymous
>>807152 Now post real sources instead of dog shit, thx. Turn it over to myPillowguy maybe he'll reward you with a free matress topper.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807199 >muh fake news Stop attacking the press you fucking Nazi.
Anonymous
>>807199 Your bad at this, do they not pay you enough to care or are you simply unintelligent
Anonymous
>>807206 And yet here you are, eating everything anyone feeds you with glee.
Anonymous
>>807209 I have no problem calling his bullshit what it is
Anonymous
>>805929 >Investigating election fraud is election fraud Democracy with American characteristics
Anonymous
>>807248 They impeached Trump for trying to investigate Biden
Anonymous
>>807215 >still promoting the fictitious Big Lie which even the Liar in Chief himself doesn't really believe happened but still peddles it because as a narcissist with the emotional development of a 2 yo toddler he isn't man enough to admit he got BTFO fair and square >thinks he's calling bullshit on people who ridicule and laugh at him for being such a gimp Don't you have a myPillow to bite?
Anonymous
>>807283 Mention the mypillow guy a few more times, it'll start making your arguments better any minute now.
Anonymous
>>807283 >>807139 >>807199 >>807291 Stop trying to engage in guerilla marketing.
Anonymous
>>807291 My argument was already foolproof when I listed
>>806878 and called you out for promoting the Big Lie conspiracy theory that only those as loony as yourself and myPillow guy still flailingly grasp at.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807293 Leave or I show you guerilla marketing, commie trash. This board is MyPillow territory.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807296 Dude, first of all trying to prove a negative is never a foolproof argument, second I just linked you an entire website full of evidence that you spazzed out and ignored, all you've given me is an appeal to authority at best.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807248 >>807250 They bragged about megacorps getting together to alter voting law in their favor and make sure trump would not be elected again
>>807291 That guy isn't very creative. He latches on to something dumb and keeps spamming it for about 30-90 days.
He really is the most bothersome person here
Anonymous
>>807296 The literal pedophile who couldn't fill a driveway with excited supporters did not get more votes than Obama. That's just common sense.
Anonymous
>>807152 >Ultra right wing Republican Supreme Court >Ignoring the fact that Trump destroyed the postal service and we still don't know how many ballots weren't delivered in time. >The error rate https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2020/11/23/detroit-absentee-ballots-board-of-canvassers-precincts-out-of-balance/6398071002/ voter 'fraud' didn't happen. But Republicans like you will lie your ass off to give you an excuse to steal elections.
Anonymous
>>807321 We better investigate all the voter fraud Trump committed then if he didn't get more votes than Obama given you're talking about Trump.
Anonymous
>>807322 >voter 'fraud' didn't happen. You could make it far in Myanmar.
Anonymous
>>807323 >There is no pedophile devil cult >Okay there is a pedophile devil cult but trump is a part of it Nah I was obviously talking about Joe biden. He had zero visible support and he touches kids on camera. Trumps wife is a supermodel and everywhere he goes there's stadiums full of people cheering for what he's saying.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807326 There has not been a single widespread case of voting fraud in myanmar. Period. Everything your sturpdentrumpenfuhrer is telling you is a lie
If there was voting fraud in myanmar please provide evidence.
I'm waiting
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807299 It's the most comfortable pillow you'll ever own. Guaranteed.
Anonymous
>>807322 >Ultra right wing Republican Supreme Court God I wish that were true.
>Ignoring the fact that Trump destroyed the postal service and we still don't know how many ballots weren't delivered in time Because it would be irrelevant even if it were true.
>The error rate So they fucked up even worse in the last election? Where are you going with this?
>voter 'fraud' didn't happen. Yes it did, it's an endlessly verifiable fact. I know clicking links and reading aren't your forte but
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud/search Anonymous
>>807354 >Yes it did, it's an endlessly verifiable fact. Gosh, I guess someone should let all of the Trump appointed judges who laughed his cases out of court know. You voter fraud cultists are unhinged.
Anonymous
>>807354 >source listed literally states their investigations over the course of many years has only revealed a handful of fraud cases by individuals. LMAO!
Anonymous
>>807355 Great appeal to authority, got any arguments?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807359 No it doesn't, take your pills. Even one proves you wrong anyway.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>807360 >Great appeal to authority, got any arguments? I'm not surprised you don't understand what an appeal to authority is. Appealing to authority on its own isn't a logical fallacy. Only when you appeal to authority simply BECAUSE it is an authority does it become a fallacy. It is both possible to appeal to an authority and for that authority to be correct. They aren't mutually exclusive. My argument is that the evidence for widespread voter fraud was laughably incoherent and completely baseless AND that the authority in question, a judicial body who specializes in examining and ruling on the legitimacy of this kind of evidence, also agrees with my assessment. The overwhelming consensus is that Trump's team was full of shit. You're welcome for the logical fallacy 101 lesson, by the way. I imagine voter fraud cultists aren't exposed to coherent arguments too often so consider this one a personal favor from me to you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807366 >Appealing to authority on its own isn't a logical fallacy. Only when you appeal to authority simply BECAUSE it is an authority does it become a fallacy Actually that's exactly what you're doing.
>My argument is that the evidence for widespread voter fraud was laughably incoherent and completely baseless It's not, and I've already shown you more evidence than I can even list. You're just being obtuse at this point.
>The overwhelming consensus is that Trump's team was full of shit. Wow a bandwagon fallacy, thanks for the lesson Professor. Gotta admit Rudy sure dropped the ball though.
Anonymous
>>807338 It's called projection, Q is used to cover up the real pedo cult that Trump and the conservatives are apart of.
Anonymous
>>807354 >Citing Heritage Foundation One of the biggest proponents of pushing for the new Jim Crow laws
LOLOLOLOL
Anonymous
>>807152 >By the way affidavits are admissible evidence in a court of law Yes, but that doesn't mean they're actually evidence in the case being argued. The vast majority of these affidavits have absolutely nothing to do with fraud (they're literally shit like "someone at the polling place was wearing a BLM shirt and that made me feel uncomfortable") and the few that actually do allege fraud aren't substantiated by anything - affidavits alone aren't enough evidence.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807452 Also bring up Perjury and see how many of those 'affidavits' are suddenly going to dissolve.
Anonymous
>>807440 >>>reddit.com >>807452 >. The vast majority of these affidavits have absolutely nothing to do with fraud (they're literally shit like "someone at the polling place was wearing a BLM shirt and that made me feel uncomfortable") I call BS, if you'd actually read through ebough of those entries to make an accurate judgment you would've noticed stuff like this:
>353 counties in 29 states have more voter registrations than voting-age citizens >https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/new-jw-study-voter-registration/ >Also bring up Perjury and see how many of those 'affidavits' are suddenly going to dissolve. I'll be glad to wager on that when there's an evidentiary hearing.
Anonymous
>>807475 >353 counties in 29 states have more voter registrations than voting-age citizens That's not evidence of fraud nor is it an affidavit.
Anonymous
>>807482 Nigger.
That you are, for you need this spelled out for you.
If there are more registerwd voters than voting age citizens, that means there are registered voters that don't exist.
That means someone could've used them to request fraudulent mail-in ballots. In places where they sent those to all registered voters, half the work is already done.
This isn't speculation, it's a proven fact that this has happened many times.
Read.
Anonymous
>>807484 None of that means any fraudulent ballots were actually counted. This is evidence of fraud in the same way someone owning a gun is evidence of murder - it's not.
Anonymous
>>807485 Holy shit dude you are so god damn obstinate
on.wsj.com/2YeaGPY Anonymous
>>807475 Vast majority of the counties with over 100% voter registration were red counties
Anonymous
>>807494 Nothing in here has anything to do with what we're discussing.
Anonymous
>>807497 Fascinating, now how about Detroit?
>>807152 Anonymous
>>807475 >The study found eight states showing state-wide registration rates exceeding 100%: Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Well ho-ly shit.
Every one of those states have something in common.
I wonder if it's republicans commiting voting fraud.
Oh wait no, they're all blue
(;ŏ﹏ŏ)
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>807498 If it weren't for the fact that this board is infested with paid shills I'd suspect you're pretending to be retarded. It's a documented, proven case of fraud using mail-in ballots. You need severe damage to your prefrontal cortex to think there's no reason it couldn't have happened again. And if the very fact that the supposed winner smashed the record for most popular votes, in an election where his opponent also beat it, while also winning a record low number of counties, isn't reason to suspect something, I can't imagine what would be.
>>807502 Funny you mention that. Say, what state was it that sent mail-in applications to every name on the list again?
>>807503 It's called staying on topic.
Anonymous
West Virginia: Mingo County (104%); Wyoming County (103%); McDowell County (102%); Brooke County (102%); Hancock County (100%)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807509 I think the results in those counties should be questioned too. Happy now?
Anonymous
South Carolina: Jasper County (103%)
Anonymous
Indiana:Hamilton County (113%); Boone County (112%); Clark County (105%); Floyd County (103%); Hancock County (103%); Ohio County (102%); Hendricks County (102%); Lake County (101%); Warrick County (100%); Dearborn County (100%)
Anonymous
>>807514 Seriously what the fuck are you trying to prove?
Anonymous
>>807516 ?
I was just posting data from the article you provided us
Anonymous
>>807506 >It's a documented, proven case of fraud using mail-in ballots. And? I can also find documented, proven cases of people raping dogs. I guess that must mean you probably rape dogs too.
>You need severe damage to your prefrontal cortex to think there's no reason it couldn't have happened again. I never said there's no reason it couldn't happen again. What I said is that there's no evidence it happened again, which there isn't. Just like there's (hopefully) no evidence of you raping dogs, therefore you probably don't even though it's been proven other people have raped dogs before.
>And if the very fact that the supposed winner smashed the record for most popular votes, in an election where his opponent also beat it, while also winning a record low number of counties, This is a trend that's been going on much longer than 2020, it's a symptom of our increased political polarization and nothing more. Urban voters move more and more towards the Dems and rural/suburban voters more and more towards the Republicans, which leads to Dems having higher and higher levels of popular support while also being less widely spread throughout the country. The same thing happened in 2008 with Obama - he broke the popular vote record while also winning with a record low share of counties, and those trends have only exasperated since then which caused the situation in 2020. The only difference is Trump leads a massive popularity cult and thus still got a record-breaking number of votes himself while simultaneously driving every sensible American into the arms of Biden.
>Isn't reason to suspect something, I can't imagine what would be. You're free to suspect whatever you like, just like I'm free to suspect that you rape dogs. It doesn't mean it actually happened though.
Anonymous
>>807517 So nothing? Cool.
>>807518 >And? I can also find documented, proven cases of people raping dogs. I guess that must mean you probably rape dogs too Imagine there's whining dogs with cum dripping out their prolapsed buttholes in a town where many people have been busted for bestiality before. You're telling me there's nothing to see here. But if you're so sure, here's an example from the 2020 general:
https://www.hometownlife.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/01/20/canton-man-pleads-guilty-voting-fraud-misdemeanor/4232296001/ Anonymous
>>807519 Congrats, you found a single example of an instance of attempted fraud in 2020, which was caught in action and fixed before any fraudulent ballot was actually counted. What's the problem?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807519 >So nothing? Cool. Nah all facts.
Anonymous
>>807521 Now imagine how many they didn't catch.
Anonymous
>>807523 I can imagine it, just like I can imagine you raping dogs. Neither fantasy means anything without any evidence to substantiate it.
Anonymous
>>807525 Well, I only showed you a whole website full of evidence. What more can I do?
Anonymous
>>807526 Actually provide evidence of voting fraud in the 2020 election, which the website fails to do.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807527 Well, you can link Anon a website but you can't make him read. Guess we're at an impasse.
Anonymous
>>807509 DELET
E
L
E
T
NAO!!
A
O
!!
Anonymous
>>807523 >Now imagine how many they didn't catch None
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807526 >Well, I only showed you a whole website full of evidence. What more can I do? >>807509 >>807513 >>807514 Anonymous
>>807529 Don't you see? If we prove enough results from red states are questionable we'll prove the ones from the blue states aren't!
Anonymous
>>807530 2020, first perfectly clean election in history. That's very imaginitive of you.
Anonymous
>>807530 Lol your bad at this
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807539 >unironically citing Hereisthelies LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>807438 No, bro, we knew about the pedophile devil cult way way way before Q ever became a thing. The entire msm was covering, calling it fake news, then Trump took that phrase and turned it on them by calling them fake news. "No, YEW are fake news" because the people calling pizzagate fake news is actually fake news. This goes back to my original point in this entire thread which is that the democrats, the msm and big tech all conspire towards common goals, as evidenced by how they all used the same selectively edited clips and the same bull shit narrative to try to say trump incited an insurrection. They all conspired to claim he was a Russian plant too. The msm never bothered to point out the democrats bullshit because they're on the same bullshit.
Anonymous
>>807532 I'm not the other anon you've been arguing with but just Google a picture of a Joe biden rally, then google a picture of an Obama rally, then google a picture of a trump rally. Joe biden didn't have any visible support. Trump gained 11 million more votes than 2016, but somehow Joe biden still got more votes than anyone ever? Does that at least stand out to you as a little bit interesting?
Anonymous
>>807589 These "people" don't give a damn about the truth anon. Just "their" truth
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807590 Maybe their just really misinformed? That's what the msm is supposed to do, misinform people. I used to have no idea how much the msm lies. I figured that if they were on TV and had a big news building and all that then they must be a legitimate source of news, and I assumed they were being honest journalists. Now I know they're scumbags who are trying to make people hate the guy who cuts our taxes and brings peace to the middle east.
Anonymous
>>807589 It's not even a little bit interesting that membership at political rallies doesn't match up evenly with electoral support. Biden is boring as shit. Doesn't mean people don't prefer him to Trump.
>>807590 The actual truth is that Biden won the election and "your truth" is that Trump had more boat parades and death cult rallies and capitol invaders so he's the real winner.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807635 People show up to rallies when they like what the candidate is saying. It has nothing to do with entertainment. They aren't telling jokes or singing, they're sharing their political thoughts. People weren't excited to listen to Joe bidens political thoughts and that does indicate how many people are going to vote for him. Why did republicans win everything else down ticket? Why would people vote for Joe biden then vote for all republicans or not at all down ticket? The truth is that when they committed the fraud they didn't have time to vote down ticket, they needed to make as many fraudulent ballots as possible as quickly as possible. I'm interested to hear your explanation why? Even if you don't change your mind after this conversation I still think it's interesting to hear how you explain all the weird stuff that occured during the election. So much weird stuff happened but according to you there's nothing weird at all about any of it.
Anonymous
>>807589 >Hurr Durr but muh orange man had "bigger" crowds >THIS is the election fraud evidence we've been looking for You could cite any number of idiotic claims, yet you chose to pick the dumbest and most retarded one. Nice work, chud
Anonymous
>>807589 >>One popular candidate pre-covid >>one candidate who tells supporters covid isn't real >>one candidate makes covid precautions important to platform Gee I wonder why.
You retards also forget how anti-Trump a lot of people are.
Anonymous
>>807635 Anyone who is even vaugley honest is prepared to admit that the past election was highley irregular and that the irregularities were mainly limited to states with weak rules about mail-ins and that it was in these places that Biden won the election by less than 200 000 votes.
Anonymous
>>807645 What's your explanation for why nobody showed up to Joe bidens rallies? If he supposedly got the most votes ever then there would be been visible support for him right? It doesn't make sense. Can you make sense of it?
Chuckie Chang
Quoted By:
hey tRump, Georgia called and they want their fell off a turnip truck rep back.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>807646 I don't think covid explains why there wasn't any visible support for biden. But what do you think about republicans winning everything else down ticket? Why would joe win the most votes in history but those same voters didn't vote democrat down ticket? That seems strange to me and I hope you can explain it.
Anonymous
>>807649 >the past election was highley irregular and that the irregularities were mainly limited to states with weak rules about mail-ins Nope and that's why 60+ cases were laughed out of court, Republican election officials proved through multiple audits and recounts that wasn't the case. Trump promoted the Big Lie because he's a 2 yo in a morbidly obese dementia addled decaying carcass and can't accept he was forced to give up his toy through a fair legitimate election, in short btfo and was a loser. And the Republicants who know better are grasping at the Big Lie as an excuse to restrict people from voting so they can win w/o changing their policies and platform to match the majority of Americans. Simple as.
Anonymous
>>807657 Try having an original thought instead of just mindlessly repeating the absolutely retarded drivel of your cult leader
Anonymous
>>807665 Why are the people in this thread so hostile about this? I asked a question and you're using language like "absolutely retarded drivel of your cult leader". Just say you disagree? Why are you acting like that? I'm just wondering why these backwards things happened. Why did Joe biden have zero visible support and why did he lose everything else down ticket? Maybe somehow Joe biden won fair and square, I don't think so, but maybe I am full of shit so I'm asking questions that you act like you have the answers to and all you do is attack me.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>60+ cases were laughed out of court >Big Lie
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807676 /news/ is just bots and activists, its largely a containment board.
Anonymous
>>807676 Why are you so dense and blind that you don't realise Trump was the most despised politician in American history with good reason for an overwhelming majority of Americans? Rally crowds don't mean shit even though your Dear Leader was obsessed with them and spent the entire 1st week of his presidency throwing a bitchfit about his inauguration crowd being smaller than Obama's and forcing his administration to create deep fakes about it and having KellyAnne Twatway say "alternative facts are just as valid as the real facts."
The majority of Americans would have voted for a moldy cheese sandwich over your morbidly obese Dear Leader that you worship like a North Korean worships Kim. Go figure, both destroyed their respective countries.
Anonymous
>>807709 One thing I always wondered about obvious posts like this- do you think people write them on the spot, or is there like a bank of pre-made agitposts they draw from?
Anonymous
>>807664 18/19 bellwether counties were wrong. That's beyond unprecedented. Just one of many irregularities. But yeah, I know, ORANGE MAN BAD. Don't forget to chant as much while you dilate, faggot tranny.
Anonymous
>>807657 they were voting trump out not voting for biden, kind of like how they were voting for someone other than h*llary in 2016
this is burgerland now, deciding to eat horseshit rather than dogshit
Anonymous
>>807676 There is one lefty on here that screeches louder than everyone else and ties everything negatively back to trump.
I think it's either a bot or a paid shill tbqh, because it's hard to believe that any person is that freaking retarded
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807710 >>807713 Cry harder cultists, Biden won by the same electoral vote margin Dear Leader won by and he called it a landslide. The difference is Biden won the popular vote by 7+ million and Trump lost by 3.5+ million in 2016. Seethe, cope, gnash teeth, screech, etc.
Anonymous
>>807726 But trump gained 11 million more votes than the first time he was elected? More people liked him this time than last time so I don't think people were voting him out. But what about the observers? With mail in ballots the only time to verify that it's authentic is when the ballot is separated from the envelope, and the observers were obstructed from doing that in all the key states that Biden needed to win?
Anonymous
>>807733 That's been thoroughly debunked. Seriously, when are you snowflakes going to give up? You're far worse than the anorexic vegans who were crying the day after the 2016 election when Hillary conceded like an actual adult. Just because your Dear Leader acts like a 2 yo doesn't mean you have to. Grow up.
theonemirror fearsitsself
Quoted By:
Ol' Tom Cotton
Anonymous
>>807747 >Debunked Now I know you're meaning and being ironic. Debunk it then
Anonymous
>dear leader >cultist
Anonymous
>>807747 >What about election fraud in myanmar >That's been thoroughly debunked by authorities in myanmar >What about all this weird shit? >Authorities in myanmar debunked it >What about huge swathes of people in myanmar losing faith in the election process due to new laws that make voting fraud easily possible >Those people are snowflakes. The myanmar government has not found a single instance of widespread voting fraud in myanmar >Isn't it a conflict of interest to allow a body to investigate potential fraud it is accused of perpetrating? >But the fraud is debunked, there is no evidence >Shouldn't voting be such that at least the myanmar people have faith in it? >The voting process is fine the only people who don't trust it are insurrectionists >But didn't a journalism outlet in myanmar report that a shadowy cabal of well funded corporations worked tirelessly behind the scenes to alter voting law in myanmar and control the flow of information to ensure the myanmar election had a certain outcome? >The well funded corporations worked to secure the myanmar election not to defraud it I hope you can at least understand why some people have a problem in myanmar
Anonymous
>>807765 Myanmar wasn't election fraud you fucking idiot, it was a military coup. The only similarity you can draw between the 2020 US election and Myanmar is conservatives failed to overturn an election while Myanmar's military didn't.
Anonymous
>>807676 You're not going to listen to me, but you don't need to. A couple of cursory Google searches will give you piles of evidence as to why the people who attended the 2020 Presidential rallies are not representative of the American electorate in slightest.
Furthermore, the sheer ambiguity and level of subjectivity that comes from basing your "argument" on some anecdotal recollection of some rally sizes (during a fucking pandemic, no less) should make you embarrassed to even think about making such a lazy and disingenuous claim at this.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807728 That's a nice cope there, Chud.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807761 Go polish Dear Leader's knob some more, cultist.
Anonymous
>>807778 >>807779 Idk if these are the same person or not but here's security camera footage of the ballot counting. The bottom right camera shows the observers in the back against the wall, the top right camera shows where the ballot counters are. The observers are facing the ballot counters but look at the distance between them, nobody can read a signature from that distance. 1. Do you understand what the cameras are showing and where everyone in the room is? 2. Do you think the observers can read a signature from that distance?
Anonymous
>>807661 >But what do you think about republicans winning everything else down ticket? McSally, Loeffler, and Perdue will be happy to hear that they're still Senators.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>807795 >youtube Great! The Quaken turns out to be a deep fake, lol!
Anonymous
>>807795 >no audio from security camera >no indication anything was communicated at all >some people off camera out of view >"THEY WERE INSTRUCTED TO LEAVE THE FACILITY AND STOP COUNTING" Gotta love conspiracy nut schizos
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807794 Republicans gained seats in the house but what about the observers not being allowed to verify the ballot signatures?
>>807798 >>807800 My one question is, do you think the observers can verify a signature from that distance?
Anonymous
>>807792 Two different anons. You're just espousing baseless conspiratorial garbage and it's obvious that you lack even the most fundamental understanding of just how bipartisan the poll workers and how decentralized our voting system and how stupefyingly impossible it would be to actually "steal" the election by fraudulently manipulating vote totals.
Not only that, this has already been litigated in court, but you refuse to accept anything else. Trump got destroyed and shot down by scores of his own judges. But you'll still be here tomorrow asking the same fucking thing and nothing will ever change because you're hopelessly dependent on that Orange Piss flavored koolaid.
Anonymous
>>807804 Do you think the observers in the video can verify a signature from that distance?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>807808 You've gotten so far off the path that you're arguing over something completely subjective and absolutely irrelevant to the larger picture
Anonymous
>>807814 >>807826 The observers cannot read a signature from that distance. Can you explain to me how a person could read a signature from that distance? This is relevant because the observers werent able to verify whether the ballots were authentic or fraudulent. This is evidence of fraud. Why would any honest person not allow observers to verify the ballots? I'm focusing on one key verifiable fact at a time so we don't start having twenty different debates with each reply. I just want to come to an agreement on one specific thing, whether or not the observers could read signatures from that distance, they couldn't.
Anonymous
>>807770 Do you know why the military coup happened? What caused it? Why the coup happened? What brought it about? do you know what day it happened on and why it was significant? Do you know what their stated purpose was?
You are a literal drooling retard. It mirrors the US election the only difference is it was the military who took action instead of the citizens
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807583 >He actually believes this. Why are you defending pedos like Trump?
Anonymous
>>807770 >What about election fraud in myanmar >That's been thoroughly debunked by authorities in myanmar >What about all this weird shit? >Authorities in myanmar debunked it >What about huge swathes of people in myanmar losing faith in the election process due to new laws that make voting fraud easily possible >Those people are snowflakes. The myanmar government has not found a single instance of widespread voting fraud in myanmar >Isn't it a conflict of interest to allow a body to investigate potential fraud it is accused of perpetrating? >But the fraud is debunked, there is no evidence >Shouldn't voting be such that at least the myanmar people have faith in it? >The voting process is fine the only people who don't trust it are insurrectionists >But didn't a journalism outlet in myanmar report that a shadowy cabal of well funded corporations worked tirelessly behind the scenes to alter voting law in myanmar and control the flow of information to ensure the myanmar election had a certain outcome? >The well funded corporations worked to secure the myanmar election not to defraud it >Didn't the people not have faith in the 2020 November federal election? >Yes those were the snowflakes and their conspiracy theory was debunked >Didn't the myanmar military declare a state of emergency the day before officials were sworn in? >But that doesn't have anything to do with this >But the military declared this state of emergency because the citizens of myanmar didn't have faith in the election results. Isn't that something? >Once again, myanmar has never had any widespread evidence of voting fraud >Is it bad that the military invalidated the election and is reholding it so that the citizens oh myanmar are satisfied with it? >It doesn't matter what conspiracy theorists think, there's no evidence of voting fraud in Myanmar Hey retard. Maybe you can understand this better now that I've added a section
Anonymous
>>807834 You're NOT going to come to an agreement on this because your claim is subjective. Not only that, if true, you wildly conclude that it automatically constitutes massive fraud on the part of Democrats, when it could just as easily have been the other way around.
Lastly, this matter has already been settled in court. I repeat, these. matters. have. already. been. litigated. The courts have deliberated and they've ruled. You lost. The only difference is that you are wholly unwilling to accept the findings. You cannot win this argument and you never will, so you're just stuck like a crackhead combing through the carpet trying to find that long lost magical rock.
Anonymous
>>807852 >Lastly, this matter has already been settled in court. I repeat, these. matters. have. already. been. litigated When?
I thought all the judges refused to let it proceed to litigation
Anonymous
>>807866 There's been over a hundred court cases now, most went to litigation. The SCOTUS one was dismissed on procedural grounds, as the lawyers who wanted some quick cash off it knew it would be, some were dismissed due to lack of or fraudulent evidence, but there's not a lot of things in history that have seen more court rulings than this election.
Anonymous
>>807852 Which claim is subjective? That the observers couldn't read and verify signatures on the ballots from that distance? Do I have to prove that to you with facts? And no I didn't say that this was the only evidence necessary to prove the election was stolen but it is a key piece of the overall case. It could have been the other way around but it wasn't, it was the republicans that were kept from observing. Right now I'm not trying to get you to agree that the election was stolen I'm only trying to get you to agree that those observers were not able to verify if those votes were authentic or fraudulent.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807868 >most went to litigation. Source please?
Anonymous
>>807834 >The observers cannot read a signature from that distance. Can you explain to me how a person could read a signature from that distance? They ask
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807845 >the only difference >Do you know why the military coup happened? What caused it? Why the coup happened? What brought it about? do you know what day it happened on and why it was significant? Do you know what their stated purpose was? Wew lad
Imagine losing an argument to yourself.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807850 Not reading your opinion. Thanks though!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807326 >Myanmar I wouldn't be surprised if claims both sides are making of each other are true.
Anonymous
is it really "tape" if all that stuff is digital now?
Anonymous
>>807871 You're incredibly retarded but A for effort, lmao.
Anonymous
>>807874 >>807891 I looked at the video again and noticed that the people counting the ballots aren't even facing the right way for the poll watchers to see the signatures. The poll watchers can only see the back of the ballots. The ballot counters are closer to each other than they are to the poll watchers so I don't see any reason why the poll watchers shouldn't be allowed to be closer. And on top of it all there were in fact ballots counted while no observers were present and that was at the same time that Biden got a spike in votes.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807883 It's just used as a catch all term that's a lot easier to understand than audio recording.
Anonymous
>>807902 Keep in mind this video was debunked months ago. It is cute watching you guys still spin away like its fresh news
Anonymous
>>807932 Debunked blah blah blah stay ignorant
Anonymous
>>807902 You haven't even touched the tip of the iceberg and I'm disappointed by how many different threads you continue to miss
Anonymous
>>807934 Says the schizo regurgitating cable news talking points
Anonymous
>>807932 >Keep in mind this video was debunked months ago. Source?
Anonymous
>>807940 Georgia sec of state
Anonymous
>>807937 >>807939 Suck my dick you trolling faggots
Anonymous
>>807948 Concession accepted.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The common and root causes of all social problems are people's ignorance, immaturity, mental illness, personality disorder, and low-level education that neglects them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807946 >Trump shill who is projecting Trump Really makes you think
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>807792 The roles of observers vary by state and in Georgia there's no law requiring them to be able to read signatures. They're there to make sure ballots aren't literally being tossed out and burned, not to do the verification.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
As former President Donald Trump comes under scrutiny from a grand jury in Fulton County, Georgia, CNN legal analyst Elie Honig believes Trump has already created a "major problem" for himself through his own words and actions.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Reminder that Trump still tried to steal the election
Anonymous
Quoted By:
https://www.vox.com/2021/3/16/22333805/washington-post-correction-trump-georgia Explaining how Trump is far from off the hook for his election fraud in Georgia.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>810451 >only evidence is alleged transcript of a phone call between Meadows and a Georgia official Ironic, given the last alleged major bombshell involving Trump and a phone call to a Georgia official was debunked as yet more leftist conspiracy hokum
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>810465 >debunked There's that word again that doesn't apply this this investigation.
>'I just want to find 11,780 votes' Anonymous
Anonymous
/pol/ wants to slide this thread, I couldn't imagine why
Anonymous
>>811955 Because its over 48 hours old and there is already a more popular thread on the topic
>>808140 Are you bumping this one because you are getting btfo in the other one?
Anonymous
>>811957 More popular?
>233 replies >43 replies Anonymous
>>811959 >one is being talked in by people >the other is not and had to be bumped by you Yes, one is popular and the other is not.
Maybe I will just shit out 60 posts and get this thread past its bump limit? Do you want that?
Anonymous
>>811965 But that thread is the Trump damage control one and it just confirms /pol/ is sliding this one in favor of one with their false narrative.
Anonymous
>>811976 /pol/ doesnt come here. /pol/ is on /pol/.
Anonymous
>>811979 Yet you're from /pol/, otherwise you'd know the massive tell you just gave that proves you're from there and not /news/.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>811979 You have to go back.
>>>/pol/ Anonymous
>>811959 >/pol/ is now spamming their thread while trying to slide this one. I find that funny.
Anonymous
>>805929 Law and order is racist. How dare he show he was present and ready for scrutinizing the people who answered to him. Not like he was an elected official. I want to see brown god damnit. If it aint coming from brown, its illegal. Just like the constitutional right for a pres to give and seek council. Also, upon such council issue expectations and advice...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>812152 Still bumping your shit thread no one cares about?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>saging on /news/
Anonymous
>>805990 More because of demography but yeah, your conclusion isn't wrong.
Anonymous
>>805990 >>812248 That really depends on if the Democrats cave and not push through the new voting rights act, or the Republican control supreme court give them cover.
If either of those happen, the deck will be so entirely rigged in the Republican favor where Trump would be able to win again if he ran even from a jail cell.
Anonymous
>>812248 Republicans made huge gains in the Hispanic vote, nothing to suggest this won't continue.
Also, fyi, Biden barley won the electoral college.
>>812251 >The only way we can win is by cheating Lol
Anonymous
>>812254 >The only way we can win is by cheating That's been how the Republicans have operated for the past 20 years. In the last 8 presidential elections, they've only won the popular vote once.
Gerrymanding is going to get much worse this cycle, and Senate Democrats represent almost 40 million more Americans than Senate Republicans.
There's also the fact that Republicans outright stole the 2000 election, conspired with a hostile foreign power in 2016 and staged a failed coup attempt in 2021 while now pushing a glut of voter suppression laws that are directly aimed and suppressing the black vote in what can only be declared as New Jim Crow.
Speaking of voter suppression, this is the Heritage Foundation's argument against giving DC statehood.
https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1374033974700478470 Anonymous
>>812263 >That's how they have been operating! No it isn't.
>Popular vote! Doesn't matter, stop pretending it does.
>Gerrymandering! Done by both sides.
>Senators! 20 million! And in the House?
>Muh 2000 muh 2016 Talking points
>Voter integrity is voter suppression! Talking point.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>812375 /pol/ doesn't know that Anonymous
>>812449 So in your opinion ,this post is /pol/
>>811955 ? Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>812591 What is the definition of is?
Anonymous
>>805990 >Republicans will never have a president again after this Nobody listens to your babble anymore, Shareblue. Back to redddit with you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>812882 >/pol/ppet bringing back their 5 year old boogyman since they got nothing new to talk about. >>>/reddit/ Anonymous
>>812267 >Talking points Funny how Ivan thinks he can handwave facts if he calls them talking points.
Anonymous
>>813453 >handwave facts if he calls them talking points. Ah, glorious tactic of powerful regime of democrat may their enemy be as little unarmed girl before them
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>813456 But it's the Republicans who are using this.
you're clearly using the other well know Republican tactic called projection.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>812882 >Shareblue What kind of mush did Latoya cook up for you in the Medicaid nursing home Gramps? Are you cranky because LaDarius is late changing your diapers?
