Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
[366 / 1 / ?]

Why do they gaslight so? what are they afraid of?

No.851042 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Forensic audit deleted files explanation
Full hearing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX0UllUPCjQ
Deleted files portion https://youtu.be/iX0UllUPCjQ?t=2445

Your being lied to by headlines that say the auditors claim the data was never deleted.
Here is transcript of the hearing they are reporting on.

>Did you determine that the D database directory was deleted?

>I did.
>Let me add color behind that. We follow an forensic acquisition process. we dont turn the machine one.. [explanation ensues]... and we produce a forensic copy.
>This machine had 6 drives, and we determined two were in a mirror configuration. the other 4 drives were utilizing RAID1+0, which is mirrord and striped data.
>The county did not provide this information to us so we performed a discovery process to determine this.
>Part of the dscovery process is a scan which detects partitions of data as well as the Master File Table (MFT). The MFT is a record of all files and pointers to the files on the hard drive.
>in the course of performing the MFT discovery i discovered an MFT that very clearly indicated that the database directory was deleted from that server.
>all of this may be considered a moot point as I have since recovered the deleted files and i have access to that deleted data

>with that being said, do you still need to get the data from the county? or did that recovery/rebuilding process give you the information you need to continue on?

>I have the information i need from the recovery efforts of the data


This is actually a fairly honest and unbiased account here: https://ijr.com/arizona-audit-allegedly-deleted-files-maricopa-county-recovered/
>Arizona Election Audit: Allegedly Deleted Files in Maricopa County Recovered

This is just outright gaslighting