[50 / 1 / ?]
38KiB, 660x441, 71a416c4-d514-455b-a583-1973c32055ce-biden_AGs.jpg
>https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/08/05/gun-violence-white-house-state-ags-huddle-accountability/5496100001/
its the 1990s all over again. In the 1990s democrats like current Gov and rapist Cuomo, who worked in Clinton's HUD department, would file frivolous lawsuits against handgun makers with the goal of putting them out of business via legal fees. They purposely chose handgun makers over rifle makers because the handgun makers had smaller bank accounts and would succumb to legal fees easier and they would file a fuck ton and word the so they could not be consolidated so that it would waste more legal fees. That is why the PLC act was passed and why you can sue gun makers for defective products, but not for gun crime like how you can't sue Ford for drunk drivers unless the car was defective in some way to cause the accident.
See
https://opensourcedefense.substack.com/p/osd-128-nobody-needs-an-assault-lawyer/
Dems are at it again now. They must have smelled blood in the water with Remington, who failed due to mismanagement by a venter capitalist group who reduced the quality of their firearms, and are planning again to use extra legal methods to deny Americans the ability to buy a gun via bankrupting gun companies with baseless and frivolous lawsuits.
Under obongo, obongo used extra judicial means to get banks not to give credit and do business with gun, ammo, porn, alcohol, and "racist products" makers or sellers.
I hate democrats so fucking much, I wouldn't piss on one if they were on fire
its the 1990s all over again. In the 1990s democrats like current Gov and rapist Cuomo, who worked in Clinton's HUD department, would file frivolous lawsuits against handgun makers with the goal of putting them out of business via legal fees. They purposely chose handgun makers over rifle makers because the handgun makers had smaller bank accounts and would succumb to legal fees easier and they would file a fuck ton and word the so they could not be consolidated so that it would waste more legal fees. That is why the PLC act was passed and why you can sue gun makers for defective products, but not for gun crime like how you can't sue Ford for drunk drivers unless the car was defective in some way to cause the accident.
See
https://opensourcedefense.substack.com/p/osd-128-nobody-needs-an-assault-lawyer/
Dems are at it again now. They must have smelled blood in the water with Remington, who failed due to mismanagement by a venter capitalist group who reduced the quality of their firearms, and are planning again to use extra legal methods to deny Americans the ability to buy a gun via bankrupting gun companies with baseless and frivolous lawsuits.
Under obongo, obongo used extra judicial means to get banks not to give credit and do business with gun, ammo, porn, alcohol, and "racist products" makers or sellers.
I hate democrats so fucking much, I wouldn't piss on one if they were on fire
