>>2859019You're completely stupid now.
>what the law pertaining to conservation of energyIt is called the law of conservation of energy.
I have no idea why you insist on contributing completely absurd statements and then think you were in a position to demand others 'answer this', 'explain that' or correct your obvious errors. That's not how discussions work.
>You're not whiteYou're literally advocating for motorism and space heating and calling others non-white. Kek. What are you that you are dependent on those? A fag? tranny? woman? child? cripple? negro?
>ignoranceAt no point have I insisted anyones contribution to pollution was void. All CO2-equivalent is equal.
Still: Countries are not individuals. As such there not only is no such thing as 'white' countries or the opposite but much more so: It is of no use to look at emissions from a national perspective. It is only relevant and only fair to look at it from an individual perspective. In case you're really as stupid as you make yourself look: Luxembourg probably has lower total national emissions than Simbabwe.
Do you believe that this means no one in Luxembourg should give a fuck about the environment as long as Simbabwe doesn't undercut the emissions of Luxembourg? What is the validity of this shit even? Nations are for fags and negros anyways.
>>2859020Where do you take that from again? I even made an effort to let you know the opposite. Also, like I said: I for example, like many others, am obvious proof that rejection of energy intensive lifestyle is definately not the end of industry or anything else. It's not like the entire world consisted of HVAC and automobiles only and the only industries were HVAC and automobiles. Wealth isn't limited to those either.
I must also say: It is quite odd for someone who makes a rather uneducated impression to accuse others of NEETing based on nothing when at least statistically it's much more likely the other way round.
