>>269937That's hardly a credible source. And wild men legends are prevalent in many cultures, it's not really evidence of anything.
I read something about the Indonesian legends possibly referring to Homo Floresiensis and that such legends suggested historical contact between the two species. That sounds reasonable at least.
>As for the wilderness, yes, there are lots of places in Alaska and the Yukon that are completely uninhabited.It is entirely believable, in terms of geography, that a small population of great apes could live deep in the Taiga somewhere. But there is no evidence of a Sasquatch type creature aside from sightings, and look at this map of sightings. Instead of being concentrated around the only area such a species could reasonably live, they line up exactly with the areas with the most human population. Does that not scream bullshit to you? That most of these "sightings" (the only evidence of the creature) are in California and on the East Coast?
