>>1299257>Newspapers are anecdotal.>Gives example where there's many variables in calibers and types when bear spray V guns is a binary question which would be clearly be defined.How many of the sources used were actually newspapers anyways? Hmmmmmmm.
Interesting how you would be so incredibly determined to call that study fake when govt organisations are more than willing to cite it.
https://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/Region_7/NWRS/Zone_2/Kenai/Sections/What_We_Do/In_The_Community/Refuge_Notebooks/2015_Articles/Refuge_Notebook_v17_n17.pdf>Why can't you cite a bunch of studies that show that water is wet, redone over several years.Because this issue doesn't need to be tested much more, it is pretty clear.
People who have been pepper sprayed tend to describe it as one of, of not THE most painful feeling in their entire lives. But lel bears don't care. It's totally not more effective than 60%, absolutely not.
>50% of firearm related incidents ended with the person injured.Hmmmmm
