>>1299254No, but pointing out THE ONLY STUDY YOU HAVE, uses anecdotes as a primary source.
And I quote "We collected bear spray incident records from 1985 to 2006 from state and federal agencies, newspaper accounts, and anecdotally"
Wow, a newspaper around me just reported that a gang shooting happened and the police found 17 40mm grenade shell casings, while they obviously meant .40cal pistol rounds.
But thats good enough for me, I suppose gang memebers have pic related, because according to you, thats a good enough source for a study, aside from literal anecdotes.
So yes, your sources are bullshit, give me literally any source that dosent use that study and present good data and Ill fuck off, I really mean it.
