>>2288653I have already posted examples. You are perfectly capable of googling it. Instead, you insist that humans are completely different from the standards that apply to every other creature in existence, with no basis for your claim other than "because it hurts my feelings that 'we are all one race' has no scientific basis". You make an extraordinary claim, the burden of proof is on you to prove. Hell, you can't even deny that mixed-race individuals are near impossible to get bone marrow and organ donors for because even their own parents aren't genetically similar enough, because they're a mix of too-distant genes. Forensic investigators can determine a person's race by looking at the shape of their bones. You're honestly telling me that there's no differences other than skin tone? You're honestly telling me that a certain degree of genetic distance counts as a separate species or subspecies in every organism EXCEPT the kind that's capable of speech? On what basis do you claim this? Prove it. Give me a study, since you're so enamored of that demand. If a population has 20% or greater DNA from what is recognized as a different species, does it still count as the same species? If I have a half-coyote, half-wolf, is it the same as a wolf? What percentage of foreign DNA from another species is required to no longer count as the same species?
