>>982929>>982950>Strange how everybody carries a video camera in their pocket,I don't know about you, but I tend to leave my expensive electronics at home when I go /out/. I suspect others do so as well.
>and millions of trail-cams are deployed at any moment.The VAST majority of trail cams are in places that are regularly hunted, therefore leaving remote areas free of them.Most of these cams also use infra-red technology to detect animals, so if a creature were able to see infra-red light, it wouldn't be hard to avoid them.
>Drones fill the sky,True of cities, not wilderness. Drones are also louder than sin, so any critter that isn't totally domesticated is gonna try to avoid these things.
>with satellite photo resolution down to millimeters. Only true of VERY specific areas. Nobody's gonna get millions of dollars of funding to launch a satellite into orbit to take pics of random patches of forest, hoping for Bigfoot.
>But credible evidence for bigfoot remains zilch.People seem not to be able to settle for anything less than a body. This is going to be highly difficult, if not practically impossible if we believe Bigfoot to be some kind of great ape. Here's a fun fact: The only fossil evidence we have for chimpanzee is... wait for it... nine teeth. Not even a full jaw. Nine teeth.
Not trying to be confrontational, just here to advance the discussion.
