>>362309My model has the most sensitive commercially-available chipset under $200 to date (SiRFstarIII). I don't give a fuck about GLONASS. I don't need that shit at all when I average 10 satellites well over 40dB on a regular day, especially when considering you only need 4 satellites to accurately trilaterate.
GLONASS only increases lock-on time by 20%. For me that'd be what, 2-3 seconds faster? My device is already faster than every single mobile phone and even the majority of the commercial GPS market, there’s no point in buying a newer model JUST for GLONASS capability.
>Source on the 20%: https://support.garmin.com/support/searchSupport/case.faces?caseId={a3bcf150-1fa1-11e1-73d0-000000000000}I lock in to all four +40dB satellites in less than 15 seconds and I never drop signal. I have 5m accuracy on a bad day and under 1m on a good day. All for under $200
>Your Garmin is accurate>Your model is outdatedAccurate, but outdated? That's an interesting logical inconsistency you got there.
