>>799225>utter disrespect for mother nature is killing it.Actually, hunters tend to be the most avid conservationists. It's called acting responsibility, because they know what would happen if everyone could hunt without limitation. Maybe you should do some research about the people you are so naively criticising from your ivory tower of your mom's basement.
>>799239>Shooting something with a rifle takes no skillYou've never fired a rifle, have you? It's ok, we understand you are scared of scary things, there there.
Sure, it is easier to hunt with a rifle than with a bow, but saying it requires no skill is simply wrong and shows your ignorance. Also, hunting is more than just how to use a rifle, there is tracking, stalking, anatomy, processing, etcetera. These can things differ for every kind of animal. For something that requires no skill why do I still keep learning new things constantly that makes me a better hunter?
>insecure faggot trying to prove your masculinityThe only insecure faggot here is you, since you are the only one trying to disprove your masculinity since you have not and you are trying to bring us down to your level.
>If you want to be manly and impressive try running down, or alternatively sneaking up on an animal with a knife to take it out. Or use a bow. You first famalam. I, and other hunters, have nothing to prove because we don't care about what faggots think. Not all hunting is about sport, I have gone on professional hunting operations on game farms, there is no point in proving your masculinity by making things artificially more difficult, a job needs doing and efficiency is critical.
>I think it's acceptable to kill things in two cases: That's nice. Many disagree with you. What you gun do about it? Shitpost on an armenian botanical appreciation forum?
