Here's another example:
>https://archive DOT ph/h8b5t>Homeowners contend that the beach has remained pristine because the public has been kept away. And, they argue, only by limiting the number of people allowed onto the beach can they keep it pristine.And they're right, even if they're the ones benefiting from it personally. The article goes on:
> It will probably take a number of years to make the entire beach accessible with paths and trails and beachgoer amenities.See, it's never enough to just allow access. The state fully intends to carve out paths and trails, construct stairs and wheelchair ramps, install trash cans, shitters, fences, water fountains, rinsing stations, etc.
So who is more in the right? Do We The People have the right to access pristine places when you know damned well they'll be trashed by normies? It's a quandary.
