>>2769264>>2769265Now I'm suspicious. It doesn't say "eagle" on the tag. I can't find any way to reference the number. The image looks like an online photo of an older eagle, but there's no way to know if this is what it says it is.
My wife was the one researching this (I was at work) and I'll have to ask her where she found the information. Allegedly this one's wider, lighter, and more stable, and if that's the case is worth it for me to have it by this weekend, even if it's a bit high. It's the only one in the area of this design.
However it could just be a modern double ender, and if that's the case, the only difference is the seat configuration and the fact that's it seems to be dent free.
Go ahead and tell me what you think. It's not too late for me to get the $350 standard looking one.
