>>1193709His assertions were illogical, poorly defined, and uninformed. Hard to tell whether they were an example of defective thinking, ignorance, deliberate bait, or some combination.
Refuting the numerous flaws in the argument would take significant time and by then I presume you would find yourself stuck arguing against a different set of illogical conclusions before being buried in an avalanche of logical fallacies and intellectually dishonest debate tactics.
Regardless, whether formed through intentional bad faith argument or innocent ignorance, a tarbaby is still a tarbaby.
