>>1442398>Why the fuck don’t you check the numbers yourself and figure it out?I don't know enough about it to fill in the fixed and variable cost categories.
>>1442404>It depends entirely on what you are growingWhat is best from a cost perspective?
>from 80% to 90% food security.What does this mean? Generally it is on the context of people not having enough food. You seem to be using it in the context of what you are growing yourself, not what you can afford to eat.
>>1442405Yeah I figured it wasn't cost effective at all, but figured I would check. Been some innovation lately with farmbot. Pic related.
