>>1624988Kaczynski was on point about some things and wrong about many things. Emerson is way better as a whole, if you're looking for philosophy on nature. I hope somebody here has actually read Emerson and can attest to this.
>>1624997>>1626591Pic related is "Joy Richards" with "her" pastor James Pike. After being imprisoned, Kaczynski and "Joy Richards" became pen pals and started a relationship with eachother. Kaczysnki called "her" by the nickname "Lady Love."
>>1625024"Zero empirical data" isn't a valid argument. There are plenty of things that have zero empirical data, yet we can still observe these things. Tell me what kind of empirical data would prove or disprove the existence of consciousness, dreams, love, friendship, or reality itself? We trust that these things exist without any empirical data. I still disagree with the power process, I'm just saying that this anon's argument is bad.
>>1626629Ted says that the experiment he was in was not mind control and that it was not the reason for him snapping. Of course, you could say "Ted doesn't know what he's talking about" or "the CIA is covering it up," but there is no evidence to support those things.
