>>2721455there's yards and there's yards anon. there are reasons to have big areas of grass, sure you need a place for kids to run around or to sit out with a beer or whatever, but when you get to picrel it's just unnecessarily harmful for minimum aesthetic value. there is nearly always a middle ground between a perfectly manicured 3'' swath and "foot-high weeds and grass filled with ticks and burrs", and usually it's both cheaper and looks better than the alternatives (while also being better for nature).
conservation is not just something the government and NGOs are responsible for. if you understood how harmful lawns can be I think you would probably feel the same as I do.
>>2725793yep.
