>>524584>Mixed groups have a better chance to fill in each others differencesnot as a rule. chances are an all male group will work more efficiently and with greater success than a mixed group that has to deal with drama, >muh feelings, cattiness, alliances, and general degradation of morale through divisions. women provide minimal benefit but sap energy exponentially, especially under demanding situations. and whatever benefit women can provide can be easily replaced by men who can do the exact same thing while simultaneously being able to handle other more essential/demanding jobs as well. basically
all male > majority male > mixed >> majority female > all female
>if you'd replaced any of the least contributing men with one of the contributing women it would have gone betterI can agree with that. one woman can't really dole out much drama damage all by herself and the men will keep her in line. but the fact is, the chances of having a contributing man are MUCH higher than having a contributing woman on your team because women in general are freeloaders by nature, which is why this particular group was so ill-equipped to deal with the situation in the first place. but of course no one would argue that they'd prefer one of those rare above-average functional women over a 4chan NEET on their team.
here's a clip from the other show, where they were forced to switch out a male and a female because the women's team was, again, such a disastrous failure:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqfAt7TshLw 