>>1441877No, because society has shifted in such a way that the precedent is simply not feasible to most people in today's world anymore. A precedent is an example that is considered in subsequent and similar circumstances. The circumstances have changed exponentially regardless of what external factors you want to attribute those changes to. (ie: global economy, world population, etc.) Thus, the precedent loses it's relevancy.
>Anyways, I'm done arguing needlessly to bump an otherwise dead thread. Enjoy the butthurt. 