>>1718325>I was asked asked which packs are waterproofWhere? Link the post. The whole discussion actually came from your retarded comment
>>1716363 on this post
>>1716118 where you assumed that pic related was a "meme pack" and couldn't POSSIBLY be waterproof. You then proceeded to shitpost vehemently and make a complete ass out of yourself. For example in
>>1717771 you insisted that you've "SEEN THEM," which, for the purposes of this discussion should be assumed to include the photo (you saw it when you commented) I just referenced. The pack in that photo just happens to be a Hyperlite pack made out of Cuben fiber. Not an Arc'teryx pack. Not a Mountain Hardwear pack. Not a Patagonia pack. The basic problem here is that you don't know what you're talking about, _AT ALL_, and everybody else is just waiting for you to realize that fact.