>>2647371>"le headlines">strawmanthese aren't headlines, the numerous peer reviewed studies that make you look like a fucking retard doesn't even matter
(
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7967748/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431850/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360909/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28990514/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7057208/ etc etc etc)
what matters is that you're unironically shilling for the petrochemical industry not for money (you do it for free), thus advocating in a roundabout way for the pollution of the environment and the chemical castration of our descendants solely because you're a fart sniffing contrarian midwit.
that's it.
there is literally ZERO reason to advocate for the use of synthetics once you have the whole picture like i do, arguing in bad faith, constructing strawman arguments and being an all around /out/let faggot isn't helping your case either. Don't post on MY /out/ ever again.
