>>2643334>>2643282Does your tiny mind really not grasp the difference between just counting tree species and considering the density of tree and plant species in any one place lol?
Monotone? that refers to sound you complete donkey. Also you keep just regurgitating this "biodiversity" thing and as I've told you that has nothing to do with woodlands. The bottom of the fucking ocean has massive biodiversity.
>Let's just count tree species with no regard for how they occur in the wildAlabama for example probably has roughly double that number of endemic tree species kek. I will literally go out behind my house tonight and take a pic of like 60 tree species- in a small radius. Not "compile a list" I'll go take you pictures for you lol.
Not to mention most (not all) of what they call "forestland" in Arizona is just sort of a desert landscape with a tree here or there and scrubby brush. Also most of the actual woodlands in Arizona are literal conifer forests lol.
You're honestly deranged, cannot face the manifest reality, and clearly taking it personally. Again I have nothing against states like Arizona etc. I've been to Arizona multiple times, it has it's own appeal... but the thickness and lushness of the woodlands simply cannot compete with the eastern deciduous forests and a fucking rock on the ground could see it. I'm not saying the place isn't beautiful but yes the woodlands are lesser. Get a fucking grip.
