>>277010>>277018I purposedly uploaded original pics so you can check EXIF data, which would have been your claim otherwise. Hence the watch in the first pictures, so you don't even look at EXIF data. Wait, you don't even need to look at the watch, just look at the filenames.
Pictures of the first immersion were shit as I said, so I didn't post them, I only posted a pic of the second immersion, seeing as I was actually disappointed water wouldn't even get in so I let it sit in water longer. It really is waterproof when closed, though it wasn't exactly deep.
Then it lit near the hinge because it was soaked with water, so gas was spread on the top. Try it and see for yourself. If I had soaked it with gas, it wouldn't have lit, because gas can't burn without oxygen, plus the flame is still centered around the wick.
Even if I "cheated" and added extra gas, then it means this problem can be solved by carrying extra gas... right?
And actually I refilled it like a retard just before trying as it was running low, putting white gas everywhere, and when I lit it to burn excess gas, the whole sink along with my hand were set on fire, next to the still opened 2L bottle of white gas, so I opened the faucet to soak everything and struggled to extinguish it. Too bad I didn't film it, it would have been a great example of "how not to refill a Zippo", but also a great example of "water can't do nothing against white gas on fire". In the end, this Zippo took two soakings and two full immersions over 15 minutes, and it still worked, a huge difference with your claim of
>>276737>I've dropped a zippo in water and it was dead, dead, dead. No hope of lighting.As for seconds, I'm sorry I'm no photographer. You want me to retry this evening? Make a video? What excuse will you find this time? That white gas is flowing from my faucet maybe?
>>277025Adjust the wick to increase fuel supply and it'll light much faster. It doesn't need to dry, it only needs gas to leak out.
