>>1437127>Sorry, but no. Hello
www.reddit.com>We’ve been down this road and had this discussion. No, we haven't.
>Even tobacco companies admit that smoking is bad for you. Dishonest argumentation. This has nothing to do with assessing scientific evidence. The little phrases on your cigarette box are not facts, they are dishonest conclusions of statistical associations from studies where the participants self-selected to begin with, that idiots are expected to take for granted because SMOKE= BAD has been drilled into their heads that they assume it must be true. This is the result of court decisions and courts, and the seven men serving on them are not scientifically literate or qualified. This is the result of edict, not scientific debate.
The 1964 reported assumed causation, vehemently, because the US government needed a whipping boy to distract from the real cause of the rise in cancer rates at the time, nuclear weapons testing.
There is zero hard evidence to suggest tobacco induces cancer. All studies to date rely on weak, non-randomized epidemiological studies, despite the fact that they are completely irreplicable in any healthy animal subjects. You are a moron and your entire attitude of "uhmm sorry no, we've been down this road before, even tobacco companies", is cringeworthy.
