>>1525144>>1525147>He could have, instead, traveled around blowing up the thing he was against...tech.>missing the point this hard because you can't wrap your head around the fact that some people don't give a shit about people dyingRadical action isn't for pussyfooted pacifists who think like children. Which is why the Weatherman underground are laughable in hind sight. Leaving his home to plant a bomb in the US mail system was risky enough. Transporting a bomb big enough to cause damage to any one of those targets, let alone setting it up? That's how you get caught. Bomb goes of in an empty bank, or factory, or the NYSE? So what? Its rebuilt and life goes on. Even so, a bomb that big runs the risk of killing people. One bomb goes off and kills someone, doens't matter if your intent was to not harm anybody. You're still a murderer. So what if he leaves a manifesto at the bombing sights? Nobody is going to read it and take it seriously, it may not even make headlines. Doesn't have the same weight. Put a few bombs in the US mail system and send them to people? That's how you grab people's attention because it'll scare the shit out of them. The'll take it seriously because who knows where the next bomb will end up. The guy was almost untraceable if it wasn't for some FBI agents diving into the manefesto and his brother ratting him out. That was the genius behind the bombings. He weaponized something so mundane we don't even think about it unless we have to. Who were those targets? People who all had some connection to modernity and/or academia in an almost random pattern. For a lone wolf, it was one of the most effective campaigns because here we are still talking about it decades after the first bombing. That would not be the case if he did what you suggest and travel around in his van like it was the Mystery Machine for angry luddites.
Stop thinking like a normie when trying to understand people that clearly are not normies.
