>>2487888>You said the US was using "russia shitcan from the 60's" which it's notThey would still be flying crew on the soyuz you absolute mong. Without spaceX the US hasn't had had a crew capable vehicle since 2011. You're seriously so clueless it's painful.
>prototype of a reusable single-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle">prototype >prototype Leave it to musk haters to be claim something that never flew more then a mile in altitude or downrange before exploding was "totally a SSTO bro trust me". Not to mention comparing it to a functioning product that has launched over 100 times.
>project MorpheusLOL
LMAO
Just look at pic rel. Is this really a comparison you think is valid? You can't be this much of a retard.
>That's incredibly ironic coming from a musk fanI'm a spaceX fan, not a musk fan. You're the one who keeps bringing him up.
