>>890718Whether I'm a NEET or not is also immaterial. If you were right, you'd be able to tell me how and why.
So are you right? If so, how?
>>890746That blurry ass graph is total nonsense and a frequently posted bullshit meme. People who do these very long temporal scale paleoclimate reconstructions agree that CO2 has a correlation and likely an important impact on global climate. The critical importance of CO2 as a driver of climate change is discussed in Lacis et al. 2010, and Lacis et al. 2013, cited above.
As for the long-term paleoclimate reconstruction, see Royer 2007 and Came et al. 2007:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7135/abs/nature05699.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v449/n7159/abs/nature06085.html>Within the IPCC framework anything outside of man made emissions isn't important.The IPCC only reports on science that has already been done. If it was possible to link solar output with modern climate change, it would have been done already. Many anons already presented evidence why that was not the case. Have some more:
Lockwood & Fröhlich 2007 - "Recent oppositely directed trends in solar climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature"
http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/463/2086/2447Benestad & Schmidt 2009 - "Solar trends and global warming"
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008JD011639/full 