>>2751151>Emory Peak>Most prominent mountain in Texas, 4485 ft >elevation of 7824 ft, 11th highest peak in Texas>Mount Saint Helens>4590 ft of prominence>elevation of 8321 ft>Mount Katahdin>4287 ft of prominence>5267 ft of elevationNever heard of anyone trying to say that Mount Saint Helens and Mount Katahdin "aren't real mountains" but suddenly when a mountain of roughly the same dimensions is located in Texas it's not a real mountain. It's clearly just because Redditfags dislike Texas for political reasons. Nobody who has actually summited any of the most prominent peaks in Texas would claim that they aren't real mountains, but Redditfags are too scared to enter Texas and also don't understand what prominence is.
>>2757923>These are things you GoogledWell excuse me for not knowing those figures off the top of my head faggot.
>No. The border for Yellowstone was probably created before the state border. A tiny sliver of the park extends in Montana (and another into Idaho)I don't give a shit. Good, Montana has 1 less national park than Texas.
>No. Thats park land, most of which is found in towns and along Texas’ massive coastline.So public land is no longer public land if it's near an urban area or on a coast? Again, suddenly the standards change if it's Texas. Never mind that the vast majority of the state's public land is in the two massive National Parks, the National Forests, and the state parks.
>All of this is a moot point because you’ve never been to any of these places.Pic related.
>Just high enough to get elevation sickness, but Texas is devoid of people who would even bother going.Clearly nobody understands how you intended this to be a burn of some kind.
