>>1327220>How many fish, what species, how did you evaluate them past checking to see if there was a mark, what size of fish, where they all "hooked" optimally? I'm not a fucking scientist buddy. I don't need to do copious amount of research to tell you this thing isnt going to fucking break a jaw
>You are playing to many video games if you really think modern bows are significantly less effective than guns.Are you actually defending the argument that bows are as effective as guns? If you were going to fight in a battle, would you rather have a gun or a bow? How come our troops don't use bows? I hope I'm making it painfully obvious how dumb you are being
>Proove to me that this is A) badI don't think I need to prove that putting a hole in an animal is bad. I think the burden of proof is on you to show me that it isn't bad
>B) less preferable to being pinched by magnets.I just put this in my mouth and let it pinch me. I would not do the same with a hook.
>Past that, hookless lures already exist. They use either frayed out rope or eyelets to catch teeth and each one works better than this clunky piece of shit.These only work on certain species of fish. 85% of fishing in the U.S. is done with bass, and those don't work with bass
>You never tested the damned thing if you honestly believe thisYes I did test pulling it over rocks and through weeds. It didn't get caught
>Takes all of a second to get a fish off a hookNo it doesn't. If you are using treble hooks it can be quite tricky, and often times you can gut hook or gill hook a fish, which makes it very difficult
>I have not hooked myself ever. I've brought my very young cousins fishing and they didn't hook themselves or me. This is a non issue and you will have a hard time selling that point.This obviously happens to many people. Stop denying this
