>>2256466>Time and time again, bear spray fags have been BTFO by any review of actual cases, bear spray at best will only dissuade a curious bear the same way an air horn or making yourself look big will. Meanwhile Pistols, rifles and shotguns have an overwhelmingly positive outcome for the people involved and no amount of lefty liberal faggot cope sponsored by government agencies can get over that.LOL. Lets review Todd Orr's case (dude in the pic). He had spray AND a gun. His gun proved useless. Spray was the only thing that affected the bear in his encounter. He unloaded his can and the bear stopped which allowed him to gather himself and get down the trail some before it came back a second time. He still didnt have the time/space to use his gun. You got BTFO by your own pic-related lol.
https://outsidebozeman.com/activities/hunting/archery/bad-day-bear-country>ammolandLOL. Very unbaised, rigorous review of the data I am sure.
https://bearwise.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/efficacy-of-bear-spray-smith-et-al.-2010.pdfNiether gun or spray are 100% effective deterrents. Guns are certainly more lethal and a dead bear cannot attack again but there are so many variables involved in effective use of a firearm in an attack that its effectiveness is greatly diminished by these variables. There is a reason why seasoned bear-country travelers bring both. Bear spray is a very useful, effective tool for deterring bears and no amount of retarded, ignorant gunworshipping cope from small-dicked incels sponsored by corporate propagandists (Ammoland lol) can change that fact.
