>>661394Literally no you didn't. You did not make a functioning bow string from vegetation. literally you did not do that. the bow was superior to a "thrown spear" or the "atlatl" because of the velocity achieved by the arrow. The bow exceeded/augmented the capabilities of man in both velocity and accuracy.
I could guarantee with my life you DID NOT make a bow string from fucking vegatation, that allowed you to knock an arrow and send it with more velocity than a thrown or assisted thrown spear. And somehow you correlated this with me being
> as incompetent as you are.>Just because you lack the experienceit gets worse when you say
>arrows are easy to make.not even remotely true. a balanced, true flighted and properly fletched arrow, the type of arrow you are going to need for penetrating or killing anything larger than a squirrel, like maybe a deer or bison in north America will have to be engineering perfection. It literally took thousands of years to develop this kind of technology.
>You also don't need to fletch them with feathers.There's no point to continue to even discuss buschcrafted archery with you, because you dont have even the slightest clue about anything youre talking about. You watched survival youtube, and now you think this is a viable, real life strategy. You think vegetation will yield higher-than-human-propelled velocity, and you think the arrow is easy to make and doesnt need fletchings.
and then you call ME incompetent.
tl;dr what would be the point in making bow that doesnt sling an arrow at a higher velocity than what could be hand thrown by a man? Why would you create a tool, that does a job WORSE than the method it is replacing, especially given the profound amount of work an knowledge that goes into the process?
anyway, youre probably one of the dumber /out/ posters, but 'we' need people like you, to point our fingers at and say "im not that guy".