>>2766882>ideal tomato fertilizer fruitingBoth
>3-1-4(+0,4)and
>5-1-2are specifically marketed as tomato fertilisers
Pic related is another one, which is a 3-2-5
>>2766888I did get the 8-8-6 one as it's closest to a balanced feed, but another thing I noticed besides the odd numbers is that all fertilisers here tend to be very low on P. I can't find ANY that have a P value above the N and K, and even the 8-8-6 one with a P value higher than the K was extremely hard to find.
What would you do in that case, if I wanted to boost phosphorous specifically?
