>>306162this is the single dumbest post that I've ever read on this board.
>The amount of space a BX-25 takes can easily fit 6 BX-10 magsactually it's more like 4 and 1/4 and combined they weigh 2 ounces more more than a single BX-25. 6 BX-10s is almost identical in weight to 2 BX-25s and a hell of a lot less convenient. not only do 10 rounders interrupt plunking more more often, those little cubic buggers always manage to dig a corner into your thigh when in your pocket. BX-25s don't.
>Part of being a responsible gun owner is not scaring the retardsbullshit. acting responsibly is what responsible gun owners do. the BX-25 is for maximum 10/22 plunking entertainment. when the fuck else are you supposed to use them? your retarded position not only enables their irrational fear that a BX-25 will turn your 10/22 into a "baby-killer", you seem to be supporting it.
> It attracts unnecessary attention and freaks people out.it's a standard 10/22 takedown with a scope and a muzzle device that helps reduce noise pollution innawoods. if anything the suppressor attracts questions from curious new shooters. the only people it bothers are retarded Fudds (the worst kind of gun owner) and wacko anti-gunners that, would hate it no matter what.
>My suggestion is get an inexpensive Simmon's rimfire 4x scopethat's a turd of a scope. why waste money on shit optics?
>Weaver 10/22 scope mountsWTF does that even mean? are you referring to the, not specific to the 10/22, gay tip-off Weaver brand rimfire rings that, don't come anywhere close back to zero once removed or, a Weaver pattern 10/22 scope base and standard Weaver rings?
>The Weaver mounts allow you to still use your ironswhich ones? now it sounds like you are describing retarded "see-through" rings that destroy any chance of a cheek-weld. does Weaver even make rimfire "see-through" rings any more?
