>>2285264>Pretty cheap to compensate farmers/ranchers for the few losses they suffered compared to the costs of managing against wolves and the costs of not having wolves around at all.It doesn't cost anything to not have wolves around. People pay the state to hunt the surplus game
>Doomposting. This is not a problem in North America and never has been, and it's rarely been a problem in Europe.Motherfucker, people have posted seven north American stories of armed men being killed by large packs of wolves, even into the 1920s. And that's only some of what we have recorded. There could have been hundreds of mountain men who met the same fate since 1800 and tens of thousands of American Indians. There is nothing magical about the wolves of Europe. In fact, they tend to run smaller than the Canadian and Alaskan wolves that we are forcing onto the states that have already eradicated them. BTW. Those wolves are entirely different than the wolves that used to live in the western states. A Mexican wolf would be a better fit. But they just look like an overgrown coyote and fill a similar ecological niche so they don't give the fur fags like you a big dick. Pic related