>>442859>we should focus on a case by case basis backed by scientific evidencesure, nobody's going to argue with that
but: 1) the most harmful species are also usually the hardest (and most expensive) to eradicate 2) a lot of the evidence for potential ecosystem destabilization is pretty subtle before a species actually takes hold 3) invasive removers already prioritize certain species
I mean did he have any suggestions for invasives that should be ignored?
