>>1132350>I think it's unfair to blame young girls who just want to do something worthwhile for "ruining" BSA.How is it "unfair"? GSA is a scout run organization, meaning that if they (or their parents) wanted change they could push for it and achieve it. The girls in GSA and the ones that came before them are complicit in their organization being shit; They are just shrugging their shoulders and saying: "GSA is kill, why can't we BSA and has Eagle?". They have shown through their inaction and laziness that they shouldn't be allowed into BSA. BSA is an organization that was built on men pouring their blood, sweat, and tears into it to make it the program it is today; Groups of people that have proven the can't do the same shouldn't be let in, It's frankly an insult to those who care about it.
>honestly I don't really see the issue in letting girls participate in a proven organization that already exists and can give them what they can't get anywhere else.Yeah, I'm gunna say your full of shit right here. Male only groups that have had to let women in typically get worse and have to lower their standards/expectations so women can hack it. This has been covered by:
>>1127487,
>>1127491,
>>1128545, and others. There's also the fact that BSA is/was one of the last actual male spaces left, where boys could receive mentoring that they might not be able to receive elsewhere in a program tailored to them like
>>1118663 said.
>create a totally new program for girlsThis is exactly what should be happening. If GSA is so far beyond broken you should start a new program, but...
>but that isn't likely to happenYou women are going to do what you always do; Ruin things and then demand that men fix it for you. Instead of actually taking responsibility for the things that cater to you, your going to grab onto BSA like a leach and demand that it be changed to fit your wants and needs, just like every other time this has happened.
tl;dr: Your an entitled cunt. Tits or GTFO.
