>>1444598>>1444616I can't believe I'm going to have to break this joke down for you two, honestly I'm disappointed. The guy above said something to the effect of summoning angels, except he used the word angle which is wrong.
I mentioned that it would only be good idea to summon angles if they were "a cute", which is actually the word acute which represents an angle less than 90 degrees.
But then you two chucklefucks completely missed all that and focused on the word angel, which wasn't even used. And now I feel more stupider for having to explain this to you.
At least this asshole
>>1444614 understood.