>>1909607as I predicted, you were not arguing in good faith (to clarify a point or single objection) but just to "win the argument with whatever claim you can make"
>so it's time based and not distance based then?not that your bad faith changing of goalposts (in the next response) will slow down, but no, it's based on their warranty terms, which are distance based.
but in the real world, time and distance usually are related.
If I told you I ran 300 miles, it means little, but context fleshes it out
>if I said I ran it in 1 hour, you'd laugh in disbelief (or assume I came by plane)>if I said I ran it in 1 year, you'd laugh but believe itany additional information can flesh out a distance claim.
now, how will you move the goalposts or what other dishonest argumentation tactic will you try to use to "win the argument" rather than arriving at a better understanding?
