>>1132189we're /out/, what the fuck do you think he means?
idk why the fuck all you guys cant understand dressing yourself aesthetically. I mean theres literally a pipe smoking general. The way one dresses is not purely an affectation. Thats why if you dress yourself to look like something your not its easy to tell that you are a poser. its about taking pride in yourself and also knowing yourself with a hint of having taste. Only vain retards dress merely to impress others. And only autists dress without regard to anything at all. Generally speaking, dressing practically will be pretty aesthetic, but the problem is a lot of good gear has stupid design to it that shows the makers themselves had bad taste. Purely functional would be milsurp imo because its not weighed down by bad designers trying to make it look like streetwear.
