>>1858868>>1859181All of this is circumstantial at best; it fails to adress the video itself. To this day, nobody has been able to debunk the video as being a man in a suit. There are also a number of things about the video which suggest that the subject is non-human (i.e. gait, body ratios, muscle flexing, etc.) If it really was a suit, then it was light years ahead of what the largest Hollywood studios had at the time. I very much doubt that a cowboy from California would be able to do any better.
