>>1540599Not ad hominem, because I didn’t attack YOU. I attacked the credibility of your source, which is valid. Bullshit, when it is spouted by a doctor, is still bullshit
Your attempt at misrepresentation of my argument is a classic example of the strawman, which is itself a logical fallacy.
Your whole argument is nothing more than an appeal to authority, which is itself a fallacy. Again, just because someone made him a doctor once does not mean he’s incapable of spouting bullshit.
And finally you did not provide any substantive evidence for your claim, and as the one making the claim, the burden of proof is on you, not me. Since you haven’t provided anything, I can now quote Christopher Hitchens:
>That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. 