>>1908895>pic related, toe box of a normal shoe vs one decent minimalist pair.I just posted you a standard shoe sole which is even wider and you still shill that leaf s a standard shoe. Why? Pic related.
>No, your feet accomodate the leather, not the other way around.Your feet stretch the leather after a while, while also moving together becoming more compact for more tactile movement in a closed envoirment.
> you are degenerate that sees the natural human body and wants to twist it into mishapen abominationOn the contrary, I'm all for mewing, traditional native diets and a more natural habitat but that doesn't mean that adaptations are per se negative, especially for those which need to live in the modern world. Just like moderns start to lack wiedom teeth because of our soft diet. The ideal would be a harder diet and more teeth, but as this isn't doable, having too many teeth in a too small jaw leads to even greater problems. Same goes for feet. Barefeet would be ideal, but the majorit has become woking pavement monkeys and that is no path to work on skin.´without shoes.
>but modern shoes are peak retardation I just posted you a modern shoe. Meanwhile you post soles which come from high heels, chinese ritual deformation or extra long and slim fit ones for people with extraordinary long and slim feet. Why are you feeling the need to make up shit? There are hundred of normie shoes which are just fine. Even my oxfords have a very nice big toebox. Just don't buy tipped shoes, mong.
>You are literally in a barefeet outdoors thread.And I am walking barefeet most of the day when feasable. Non the less my feat have minimally adapted as I also have to work and wear shoes. You sound like someone who never actually worked in his life in any professional envoirement.
>Not only is that illogical, but also you have zero proof to back up such a claim.Eat shit, retard.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131385 