>>1320453Now some people may say “you can’t smoke and be healthy at the same time”
Well I would point you to roger bannister, if you’re an avid runner you know this man broke the first 4 minute mile and smoked a pack a day
Just look at Jeanne Calment, she lived to be 122 years old, the oldest person to ever live. She cycled and fenced well into her 60s and smoked every day since she was a teen
You might also say “what about the over 7000 deadly chemicals?”
Just listen to what Michael J McFadden author of “dissecting anti smokers brains” and tobakkonacht-the anti smoking end game” has to say
Makaila, I’m not clear on why you feel the extra chemicals are deadly. You do realize that just because something is deadly or innocent in its natural form doesn’t always mean that it’s deadly or natural after undergoing combustion, right?
I think the tobacco industry had to submit a list of what it might add to cigarettes and the list was of 599 additives. Some of those would be for flavoring, some as preservatives, some to hold moisture so if a pack was open for several days or more in low humidity the tobacco wouldn’t dry out, some to make the tobacco burn slower or fast or hotter or cooler for various reasons, some perhaps in an attempt to make the smoke “safer” according to whatever theories there were about what was safer or more dangerous, etc.
When some tobacco companies tried marketing “All Natural” cigarettes the federal government jumped on them and told them they had to explicitly state that “No Additives Does NOT Mean A Safer Cigarette.”
Well, if you believe the federal government then the inverse of that is unavoidable: I.E. “Additives Do Not Mean A More Dangerous Cigarette.”
So there you have it straight from the U.S. Government…
… the same folks who’ll tell you that secondhand smoke is deadlier than first hand smoke and that thirdhand smoke will make you grow an extra head or some such.
